37620VOL
Barely-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 7,538
- Likes
- 15,228
Yes. I'll take both.
Without rewatching, it may (or may not) be that she guarantees one less player collapsing on drives to the bucket because they respect her shooting 3s and are coached that way. But see below.
Obviously that stat doesn't tell the whole story. People are prone to misuse it as a easy, comprehensive, and "irrefutable" way to evaluate players. People aren't numbers. Numbers are helpful, but aren't omnicompetent. I'll take CKC evaluating the film.
Interesting post. What do you think?
I think you summed it up nicely. +/- is a nice stat but as you point out, it must be interpreted and is not irrefutable. It can put you on the path to finding value in players that aren't stuffing the traditional stat sheet. But it also can be relatively meaningless in small samples. In chunks of 5 or more games it becomes more meaningful.
I always like to look at it at the end of every game to see if my eyes or the traditional stats missed anything. But sometimes the +/- doesn't tell the full story.