I mean, hopefully it's a turnaround, but her +/- against teams with a pulse tends to be poor.
vs Memphis: -10
vs Iowa: -9
vs Florida State: -2
vs MTSU: +5
vs Liberty : +10
And because all of those ar wins, you really should adjust these numbers to see if the team is playing better when she's on the court than when she's off the court. For example, Tennessee vs MTSU was +5 for the 16 minutes Puckett played, but Tennessee won by 14, so we were +9 for the 24 minutes Puckett did not play.
vs. Liberty and today vs. Richmond are the only two games of the six where the opponent was decent in which the team with Puckett on the court played better than the team without her.
And if you adjust, you could use the other 4 games, contextualized. UT w/Puckett was +15 in 24 minutes against UTM, but was +25 in the 16 minutes without her.
If you look at the adjusted +/- throughout her season, I'm pretty sure we'll see what the eye test should tell you... the team doesn't play as well with her on the court as it does without her. Worse at pressing, worse offensively, and worse in transition defense. Giv her some credit rebounding, and she's an 88% FT shooter, but unless she turns things around, she should not be getting the minutes she's getting. Her role should be as fresh legs at the end of the game; unfortunately that isn't a role that CKC makes much use of. (which is unfortunate! I'm quite sure that the players outside our starting 10 would play very well fresh in the 3rd and 4th quarters, but they don't get much opportunity for it, unless the game is already out of reach)