Actually, I said "held her own" against a really good coach. I would think someone so concerned with semantics could tell the difference. Again, she won the A&M games with talent, not scheme.
I just can't think of any instance where I've come away from a win thinking "Wow, Holly really coached circles around ______."
Amb3096 made this point in the varied opinion..."But that's my point...Holly didn't have the pressure of having to build the program. She inherited a really strong one, and that makes her job easier. IMO, it's easier to maintain something than it is to build it from scratch. She's obviously no Geno, but she doesn't have to be. She's still getting top players to come, she's still posting seasons that most coaches and fan bases would be happy with, and truthfully she's doing about as well as Pat did in her last few years." and here in lies the problem. Some of us, myself included see the program slipping away and other programs are now in the spotlight that use to be ours. I don't care how you slice it, we are not as good as we use to be. I think the house was left in good order when Pat retired. I am not sure the program is in good hands now.JMO
Using your argument, then Brenda beat Holly with talent, since she had by far the best player on the court in that matchup...not scheme.
Does anyone really expect Holly to beat a better coach who also has better players? She's not going to beat Muffet when Skylar Diggins or Kayla McBride are suited up. And she's not going to beat Tara when she's got the Ogwumike Sisters to tear up the Lady Vols. And there are lots and lots and lots of coaches that will run into that problem, but that doesn't mean that the lynch mob should bust out their pitchforks.
I would think beating a team shows that she held her own against the coach, don't you think? Or do you have some other special criteria that should be applied here?
Using your argument, then Brenda beat Holly with talent, since she had by far the best player on the court in that matchup...not scheme.
Does anyone really expect Holly to beat a better coach who also has better players? She's not going to beat Muffet when Skylar Diggins or Kayla McBride are suited up. And she's not going to beat Tara when she's got the Ogwumike Sisters to tear up the Lady Vols. And there are lots and lots and lots of coaches that will run into that problem, but that doesn't mean that the lynch mob should bust out their pitchforks.
You think Maryland had more talent than Tennessee?
Well guess what? All those players are gone. And Holly has another crack at them...
There are a lot of programs that seem to own us now. OK, we own TAMU. I'll give you that one.
Stanford, Notre Dame and who else? And she has as good a chance as any to beat both of them this year.
Holly has not lost to South Carolina, North Carolina, Rutgers
Holly has a winning record vs. LSU, TAMU, Texas and Vandy.
Holly is 1-2 vs. UK, but beat them last year in the SEC tournament when they were the preseason favorite to win SEC.
Holly is 1-2 vs. Chattanooga. Totally baffling and annoying, but insignificant in the grand scheme of how the team finishes.
Holly is 0-1 vs. Maryland, Louisville and Baylor...where each team had the best player on the court on their side.
Honestly, people make it sound a lot worse than it is.
Agreed. No excuse for playing Dunbar so little. Of course Cierra will look good against a D2 team. Why bother with the charade?
We have kind of hung in there in the SEC so far but still kind of shaky but we'll see about this year. I'm talking about the big out of conference games like ND, CONN(not played but they own us), Stanford, Baylor, Louisville, Maryland, Texas (now). Also for in conference she is 1-2 against Kentucky, 2-1 against TAMU (wouldn't call that owning), 1-1 against Vanderbilt (wouldn't call that owning). She is 2-0 against USC so far but we'll see if that continues. LSU has fallen but is still only 2-1 (not owning).
We have kind of hung in there in the SEC so far but still kind of shaky but we'll see about this year. I'm talking about the big out of conference games like ND, CONN(not played but they own us), Stanford, Baylor, Louisville, Maryland, Texas (now). Also for in conference she is 1-2 against Kentucky, 2-1 against TAMU (wouldn't call that owning), 1-1 against Vanderbilt (wouldn't call that owning). She is 2-0 against USC so far but we'll see if that continues. LSU has fallen but is still only 2-1 (not owning).
I think the key to this team having a good season is making sure the ball goes inside. We started to do that the second half against Lipscomb. Then, hopefully the outside will open up and the guards can score by committee. But, my fear is we will turn the ball over too much trying to get it inside OR our post players will get hurt or in foul trouble and our guards will freeze up and be tentative. That's the vibe I've had so far early in the season. But, if they can figure out a way to make it work, that's the blueprint I believe to be competitive.
My starting 5 right now would be Middleton-1, Nared-2, Jones-3, Graves-4, Harrison-5. Back-ups, Reynolds-1, Mass or Tucker-2, Dunbar-3, Burdick-4, Moore-5. We really need to start working these freshmen into starting rotation because they are substantially better than what we have. They just need experience. (Also, would have Carter rotate between 1 and 2. Love her defense and intensity.)
The verdict is still out on Holly and will still be out IMO until she's at least had 4 years with her players. A coach should have the luxury to recruit, teach, and mentor their players to give their vision at least a chance to come together.
I will say again though that I'm a bit disappointed at the sluggish start. We were a pretty decent team last year and we just lost two players: one to graduation and one to injury. I thought we'd be a better unit than we have been so far.
After watching our game yesterday in person, I think I underestimated losing the two players we lost. My wife, who doesn't follow as closely as I do, made an apt, astute observation: there's no leadership and passion on the court. Having a scorer like Simmons helped us because she was looking to score. Sure, that came at the expense of some ill advised shots at time, but this year, no one on this team so far really looks to score IMO. And, the ones that do on occasion are pretty bad at it and it hurts us. It feels like we have a bunch of role players out there. Hopefully this will be remedied next year for at least 3 more years when DeShields plays.
Also, losing a big, inside presence like Mercedes is bad enough but when Izzy or Graves get hurt or in foul trouble, it's REALLY magnified.
I think the key to this team having a good season is making sure the ball goes inside. We started to do that the second half against Lipscomb. Then, hopefully the outside will open up and the guards can score by committee. But, my fear is we will turn the ball over too much trying to get it inside OR our post players will get hurt or in foul trouble and our guards will freeze up and be tentative. That's the vibe I've had so far early in the season. But, if they can figure out a way to make it work, that's the blueprint I believe to be competitive.
Need Massengale on the court until someone else proves that they can consistently hit 3 pointers.
I like Middleton, Massengale, Nared, Graves and Harrison. Jones first off the bench, then Carter, Tucker and Moore. Dunbar, Burdick and Reynolds for mop up duty.
I always felt Simmons disrupted the offense because no one ever knew what she was going to do and she didn't pass very well. She started doing that better last year in the second half of the season when Tennessee made their run but it went out the window against Maryland. I kind of wonder if the effects of Simmons are lingering in that during her 4-year tenure ball distribution and passing were poor.
Good point. My main problem with Mass is that is all she can do is shoot threes and free throws and she doesn't move very well so good teams can guard her easily. Also, horrible defender but I could go with that line-up initially. I like the idea of having tall guards out there like Nared.