How is this different from encouraging a partner to commit suicide when afflicted with ALS? She wasn't of legal age for one thing.
What she did is tantamount to her getting pregnant, raising that child, then providing alcohol and/or encouragement to someone (her child; child's friend/boyfriend/girlfriend; some random stranger, etc.) to result in a drunk driving accident that resulted in her child's death.............all so she could establish a local MADD chapter.
The advocate stuff is probably BS that she has created to deflect after she realized that she was in trouble. It's doubtful that becoming a mental health advocate was anything other than zero motivation for her.
Where did I mention that what she did was acceptable behavior? I'm saying that IMO it was probably NOT a crime. That is why there is a published story. She is defending herself before a judge, not her parents.
I don't know of any case of someone encouraging a partner to commit suicide when afflicted with ALS that involved continual mocking, inferring they are being a chicken, etc.
Did you read the texts? This is not "I support your decision" it is "quit being a pansy and off yourself already" and "you're all talk, do it or quit talking about it"
You are asking us not to draw conclusions about her motivations yet you are drawing conclusions about her motivations.
I don't speak teenager... I can't say that I can interpret the tone. We don't know her intent or motivation. What is missing though is the dialogue preceding those texted comments. Those are are few that have been selected from thousands of messages. Those two comments could have very well been pulled from an angry fight over something totally unrelated. Even if time stamps indicate that they transmitted immediately prior to his death, again what is her motivation? Is she being a narcissist or was she honestly thinking that he is in so much pain that she wants him to find relief, even to the extent of making evil sounding comments to push him in that direction. I would not want her around children of my own, but did she commit a crime? If she's convicted I would expect that there will be appeals to higher courts. Is this different from Judas Priest since her message was directed at an individual rather than broadcast to a fan base?
I'm replying to a theoretical conclusion or comparison with an alternate theory (killing your kid in order to promote MADD).I'm not seeing all the facts here... just what the newspaper has selected to present and I have ideas at what might have been omitted or skewed in the interest of garnering interest from readers.
Im saying her behavior is indefensible as a human being. What some court rules is just what one court rules. You want to go out of you way to say "we dont know the whole story" or "the texts are not in context."
BS. This is downright disgusting.
You are working hard to take the defense side - did they present all the facts or is it likely that the defense is omitting/skewing. Better yet, do you think the Washington Post is more likely to omit/skew than the defense?
In the end, it's your opinion and you are entitled to it but the "we don't know the whole story" bit goes both ways and the part of the story we do know is indefensible.
I'm not talking about the crime part.
What would you have to see to have an opinion about her behavior?
Seeing the entirety of the messaging conversations, her mental fitness, her emotional maturity, and details of her relationship with the boyfriend for starters. Is she suicidal herself? Is her IQ a few standard deviations below the mean? Is there any history of domestic violence between these two? Based solely on the story, I'd lean towards an opinion of bad behavior. But I understand that it is not an all inclusive presentation of facts and those couple of sentences that I quoted many posts ago have me questioning her motivation. There are quoted texts that sound really bad. But there are also statements in the story suggesting that she really cares for the guy. I'd have a totally different interpretation if she was an ex girlfriend when she sent the texts rather than the current girlfriend.
17 year olds are not mental health experts.
So are you okay with murder as long as the murderer has good intentions, because that seems to be the point you're making.
The girl is a crazy, heartless ***** man. If she was so tired of hearing him complain about being depressed all she had to do was stop talking to him. Instead she very aggressively encourages him to commit suicide. She knew what she was doing was wrong because she encouraged him to delete the text messages before killing himself. In no world was she the least bit confused about exactly what she was doing. There are literally no excuses for her behavior and she should be punished heavily for it.
I think that I've touched on that a few times. A narcissist or a juvenile that cared for the person afflicted with mental health issues that does not understand treatment possibilities. I absolutely have differing opinions of an individual fitting those two profiles. If a narcissist, then my opinion of that person is reflective of practically every poster that is attacking me here. The other profile, while sad and misguided, would cause me to have an opinion of her that is different than pure evil.