Thunder Good-Oil
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 47,429
- Likes
- 49,372
Sorry, but being uneducated about treatment options is nowhere close to a reasonable excuse. Even if your second profile is true (which is virtually impossible based on the released texts), what she did is still evil. Her role in this was much too active for it to be written off as based on good intentions
I could more easily get behind your line of thinking if the texts showed that she only understood his decision and wouldn't stop him. That's not what happened though. She incessantly goaded him into it. When someone is depressed they are vulnerable. What she did is no different than pointing a gun at him and pulling the trigger.
I am making the distinction for the pure evil label between what she did and who she is. I'm saying that if she wanted him to end it to relieve his suffering, then I can call her participation as a misguided, ignorant, and evil act. I'm not going to label her as pure evil just yet. Most on the board can't make that distinction. I could if she was convinced that it was the only way to end his affliction.
As far as the gun analogy, mercy killings are real. They aren't necessarily committed by people driven by pure evil personalities. In fact, they're not. To her, the texts could have been no different than a mercy killer's finger pulling the trigger.