vegasvolfan
Do what you have to until you can do what you want
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2010
- Messages
- 4,692
- Likes
- 4,012
I posted several times while he was still coach why he shouldn't have been hired based on his resume. I looked at his record in more detail. IIRC, the combined win % of his opponents at Cincy was under 40%. In 3 years he had 6 wins over teams that finished with a winning record... and 3 of them were 7-6. Overall he was 6-13 against teams with winning records. Heupel was 9-3 in his first two years at UCF against teams with winning records.
His resume was thinner than the paper it was written on.
And whoever discussed football with him in his interview... should have been executed at sunrise.
Yeah not so sure I agree with your overall sentiments. I think they apply more to Dooley and whoever decided to fire Fulmer without a candidate in place. I do respect your eye for detail.
Regardless, Butch outperformed everyone, but Heupel, since Fulmer, got us to 2 consecutive 9 win seasons and thumping power 5 teams in the bowls. During his tenure, Tennessee football was fairly exciting again for many.
Thing is, it wasn't him as much as it was his coaches through his early years that got us where we were. When we started losing those guys, we became a worse team and learned just how thin his book is. I think people just didn't like the guy and noone wanted to play for him by the time he was gone.