Good Thing UT Doesn't Have A Boring Coach...

#52
#52
Great points.

Yeah, it is a good point. Totally random thread just to provoke people and the usual disciples can't wait to run to hat's defense.

What the hell does Bo Ryan have to do with the Tennessee board anyway? That's my point, it was just a bunch of drivel to provoke people and, once again, provide hat with an opportunity to further his agenda.

At least this time, he wasn't having a near orgasmic experience in his post because a few kids got arrested. I guess he's toned it down a bit.
 
#53
#53
Again, selective use of the two coaches' tourney resumes to support your POV is garbage. You calling it relevat doesn't make it so, which I pointed out with my comparison.

It wasn't a comment about style, which I believe to be irrelevant. It was about calling the two as tourney coaches comparable, which your timeline analysis falsely portrayed.

False? I know you don't like Pearl's style and that's fine but facts are facts and the end result is still the same.

2009 Tourney Wisconsin 2nd round exit, Tennessee 1st
2008 Tourney Wisconsin Sweet 16, Tennessee Sweet 16
2007 Tourney Wisconsin 2nd rnd exit, Tennessee Sweet 16
2006 Tourney Wisconsin 1st rnd exit, Tennessee 2nd round.
 
#54
#54
Dont be ridiculous. The complaints about Pearl have been the same since they started and are beard upon 5 years of watching the same issues crop up over and over.
Don't start with facts. It'll provoke him to unleash a commentary on how great Florida, DePaul, and Arizona are.
 
#55
#55
Yeah, it is a good point. Totally random thread just to provoke people and the usual disciples can't wait to run to hat's defense.

What the hell does Bo Ryan have to do with the Tennessee board anyway? That's my point, it was just a bunch of drivel to provoke people and, once again, provide hat with an opportunity to further his agenda.

At least this time, he wasn't having a near orgasmic experience in his post because a few kids got arrested. I guess he's toned it down a bit.

Maybe you don't recall the ludicrous comments from one of your brethren.

Your comments were utterly useless. Who gives a rats ass what you know of Ryan? It certainly doesn't valdate your opinion as you implied.
 
Last edited:
#56
#56
Yeah, it is a good point. Totally random thread just to provoke people and the usual disciples can't wait to run to hat's defense.

What the hell does Bo Ryan have to do with the Tennessee board anyway? That's my point, it was just a bunch of drivel to provoke people and, once again, provide hat with an opportunity to further his agenda.

At least this time, he wasn't having a near orgasmic experience in his post because a few kids got arrested. I guess he's toned it down a bit.

What you have described is pretty much textbook trolling. Sadly, I'm not immune to being sucked into it.
 
#57
#57
False? I know you don't like Pearl's style and that's fine but facts are facts and the end result is still the same.

2009 Tourney Wisconsin 2nd round exit, Tennessee 1st
2008 Tourney Wisconsin Sweet 16, Tennessee Sweet 16
2007 Tourney Wisconsin 2nd rnd exit, Tennessee Sweet 16
2006 Tourney Wisconsin 1st rnd exit, Tennessee 2nd round.
I don't dislike his style. I hate the coaching. All different styles can win. No accountability, limited D, no offensive execution, player indifference, etc equals hollow wins with talent and garbage teams when the talent fades.
 
#59
#59
Great points.

Maybe you don't recall the ludicrous comments from one of your brethren.

Your comments were utterly useless. Who gives a rats ass what you know of Ryan? It certainly doesn't valdate your opinion and you implied.

Well, two things:

1. Hat insinuated that people know nothing about a coach like Ryan, while I stated I obviously did.

2. As usual you will do hat's bidding by saying others comments are useless, but a totally random post designed to do nothing but antagonize by hat merits no criticism.

Sorry, but the Emperor has no clothes. It's quite evident to most people here that a clique of people here (like you) are willing to fawn over his every utterance and attack those who dare to point out your hero's agenda and BS.
 
#60
#60
Well, two things:

1. Hat insinuated that people know nothing about a coach like Ryan, while I stated I obviously did.

2. As usual you will do hat's bidding by saying others comments are useless, but a totally random post designed to do nothing but antagonize by hat merits no criticism.

Sorry, but the Emperor has no clothes. It's quite evident to most people here that a clique of people here (like you) are willing to fawn over his every utterance and attack those who dare to point out your hero's agenda and BS.

Kid yourself all you like, but the naked folks are the ones holding up temp number one rankings and tourney entries as some sort of absolute assurance that our guy doesn't have the problems that regularly kill our team.

I have no heroes here. I find your hollow silliness petty and pathetic. You have pointed out nothing and apparently just missed the point of the post, which is altogether shocking.

Guess your position's tough when Sweet 16 appearances are the linchpin of your argument. I'll try to be more understanding of the tenuous position you've chosen here. It's stupid as all hell to assume that all complaints about our coach are agenda driven, but you're trying.
 
Last edited:
#61
#61
Kid yourself all you like, but the naked folks are the ones holding up temp number one rankings and tourney entries as some sort of absolute assurance that our guy doesn't have the problems that regularly kill our team.

I have no heroes here. I find your hollow silliness petty and pathetic. You have pointed out nothing and apparently just missed the point of the post, which is altogether shocking.

Guess your position's tough when Sweet 16 appearances are the linchpin of your argument. I'll try to be more understanding of the tenuous position you've chosen here. It's stupid ad all he'll to assume that all complaints about our coach are agenda driven, but you're trying.
I'd love to see the tortured logic that went into interpreting my post as saying nobody knows Bo Ryan.
 
#64
#64
Again, selective use of the two coaches' tourney resumes to support your POV is garbage. You calling it relevat doesn't make it so, which I pointed out with my comparison.

It wasn't a comment about style, which I believe to be irrelevant. It was about calling the two as tourney coaches comparable, which your timeline analysis falsely portrayed.

Looking back at their entire resume, CBP has a National Championship at S Indiana and a Sweet 16 at Milwaukee. Explain why that is meaningless now.
 
#65
#65
Looking back at their entire resume, CBP has a National Championship at S Indiana and a Sweet 16 at Milwaukee. Explain why that is meaningless now.

Cool. Rick Insell has national titles at Shelbybille too, but I'm not interested.

Sweet 16s are again the linchpin of the Pearl support. If that's what you're after, congrats to you. We can do better if the guy would address some of it.
 
#66
#66
Kid yourself all you like, but the naked folks are the ones holding up temp number one rankings and tourney entries as some sort of absolute assurance that our guy doesn't have the problems that regularly kill our team.

I have no heroes here. I find your hollow silliness petty and pathetic. You have pointed out nothing and apparently just missed the point of the post, which is altogether shocking.

Guess your position's tough when Sweet 16 appearances are the linchpin of your argument. I'll try to be more understanding of the tenuous position you've chosen here. It's stupid ad all he'll to assume that all complaints about our coach are agenda driven, but you're trying.


You haven't addressed any of my points in your responses. I've not mentioned Sweet 16s, Tourney appearances, #1 rankings or anything except for the fact that you refuse to criticize hat doing the same thing you would characterize as "hollow pettiness".

I mean, isn't it "hollow pettiness" to start a thread in the manner this one was started? Yet, not a peep from you about that conflict. Nada.

You can spout all the nonesense you want about being above it all and intellectually superior, however you want to put it, but it has always been that you refuse treat hat's posts in the same manner you do anyone else's who deigns to criticize him.

As far as the agenda issue, you have got to either kidding or blind. Nobody is that vitriolic to the coach of "their" team without some personal issues and hat has been pretty forthcoming in his personal agenda. Please tell me you aren't completely oblivious to his personal crusade?You'd have to be pretty deeply enamoured with his perspective to deny his agenda, which is ironic given your criticism of the "Pearlophobes".
 
#67
#67
Cool. Rick Insell has national titles at Shelbybille too, but I'm not interested.

Sweet 16s are again the linchpin of the Pearl support. If that's what you're after, congrats to you. We can do better if the guy would address some of it.
I'm pretty sure Bo Ryan had four national titles at Platteville. Pretty sure he doesn't get any statues built for him in Madison for those.
 
#68
#68
There are not two people on this board that want a top flight basketball program on the Hill more than Hat or Papa. Nothing personal about it.
 
#69
#69
You haven't addressed any of my points in your responses. I've not mentioned Sweet 16s, Tourney appearances, #1 rankings or anything except for the fact that you refuse to criticize hat doing the same thing you would characterize as "hollow pettiness".

I mean, isn't it "hollow pettiness" to start a thread in the manner this one was started? Yet, not a peep from you about that conflict. Nada.

You can spout all the nonesense you want about being above it all and intellectually superior, however you want to put it, but it has always been that you refuse treat hat's posts in the same manner you do anyone else's who deigns to criticize him.

As far as the agenda issue, you have got to either kidding or blind. Nobody is that vitriolic to the coach of "their" team without some personal issues and hat has been pretty forthcoming in his personal agenda. Please tell me you aren't completely oblivious to his personal crusade?You'd have to be pretty deeply enamoured with his perspective to deny his agenda, which is ironic given your criticism of the "Pearlophobes".

Sure, Hat has personal issues with Pearl, but I don't give a crap. You use them to gloss over the myriad shortcomings and use your issues with hat to avoid the actual issue.

I don't share in the agenda, while u do believe ut to be reasonable. I absolutely agree that our coach could win with some semblance of coaching.

Get off the crusade and we can probably talk basketball.
 
#72
#72
His point number 1 was just completely idiotic. I don't get it.

For guys who posit themselves as so much smarter than everyone here, I don't see how difficult my point would be to understand. Hat came on by insinuating people here are stupid because they wouldn't want Ryan's style at UT, that they don't understand basketball and, hence, Ryan's style because they wouldn't want it here.
 
#75
#75
Sure, Hat has personal issues with Pearl, but I don't give a crap. You use them to gloss over the myriad shortcomings and use your issues with hat to avoid the actual issue.

I don't share in the agenda, while u do believe ut to be reasonable. I absolutely agree that our coach could win with some semblance of coaching.

Get off the crusade and we can probably talk basketball.

So, my crusade is relevant and to be criticized, but hat's you "don't give a crap about"? Exactly what is the issue with you seeing this conflict of logic?
 

VN Store



Back
Top