hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,567
- Likes
- 162,766
Do you see any irony in calling out someone for making a false claim about her?
Oooh. Now that's an interesting concept.Masks would wear The Prophet Muhammad.
Depending on the feudal setting it changes. Lord could be the lowest rank, under Count, Duke, King, whatever, or it could be a generic term referring to ones superior.I am a little rusty on my feudal society history but I am willing to take that risk
10 dentists cant agree on what tooth paste to use. But you expect 8/8 justices to agree on some health item?Ok, but you don’t know what kind of masks they’re wearing on the bench or what her increased risks are, either.
So what point are you trying to make when 7 of the 8 intelligent people who were directly involved thought it was the correct thing to do?
You’re saying they don’t know what kind of masks they can get or whether they’ll be beneficial? None of them knows more than I do about her risks?
You are making a similar assumption on the masks. You assume they have the ones that work so the request makes sense. But you havent backed it up.Ok, but you don’t know what kind of masks they’re wearing on the bench or what her increased risks are, either.
So what point are you trying to make when 7 of the 8 intelligent people who were directly involved thought it was the correct thing to do?
You’re saying they don’t know what kind of masks they can get or whether they’ll be beneficial? None of them knows more than I do about her risks?
So what what weird **** were you and Gorsuch into that “2/10, a bit douchey” has triggered you for going on three hours?So you think it’s completely out of the realm of possibility that she went to Roberts and requested or demanded he get the other justices to comply?
You’re defending her like she’s an ex girlfriend.
Again you admitted her increase risk is minimal, so who amongst the justices is being hyperbolic?Link to her choosing not to work from a safe space?
Link to her lying?
Voluntarily making a minor personal sacrifice for health or peace of mind of a colleague is not “taking responsibility for their health.” That’s just shrieking hyperbole.
You are making a similar assumption on the masks. You assume they have the ones that work so the request makes sense. But you havent backed it up.
They are supreme court justices, if all 9 agreed all the time there wouldnt be a point. Just because they dont agree on this doesnt indicate anything about their intelligence other than one disagrees.
10 dentists cant agree on what tooth paste to use. But you expect 8/8 justices to agree on some health item?
Heck if you gathered 8 vol fans together and told them to all wear orange shirts you would consider it great if 7 of them showed up in orange shirt.
How high maintenance is she where she cant appreciate that she got all but one of her coworkers to take up an optional request of hers?
And having the right to do X does not entail that it is right to do X.Other folks rights do not stop where your fear starts.