Gorsuch refuses to mask up

#202
#202
evillawyer said:
No, it's a valid comparison. You're asking able-bodied people to make a minor accommodation (walking a little further than they otherwise would have to) to make life easier on those with a pre-existing condition.
Click to expand...
I give you props for being consistent with your beliefs however we can just agree to disagree. If I park in a handicap spot it is illegal since I do not possess a permit. If I choose not to wear a mask it is ok to make that choice without the risk of being issued a fine. How long do you plan on wearing a mask? Most have been vaxed and received a booster. The BS mask shaming is getting old.
 
#204
#204
evillawyer said:
No one showed up at his work and demanded anything. The Chief Justice requested that all wear a mask because of their colleague's compromised immune system. Only one decided to be a douchebag.
Click to expand...

Only one stood up and said I’ll believe the science . Masks don’t work , we are all vaxed and boosted so we are protected , your feelings don’t override my rights . Bravo for the only Supreme Court justices with balls . You little butter cups are crying because she has diabetes and someone won’t wear a mask . Smh
 
#205
#205
PEPPERJAX said:
I give you props for being consistent with your beliefs however we can just agree to disagree. If I park in a handicap spot it is illegal since I do not possess a permit. If I choose not to wear a mask it is ok to make that choice without the risk of being issued a fine. How long to you plan on wearing a mask? Most have been vaxed and received a booster. The BS mask shaming is getting old.
Click to expand...

She has no idea. These people are just angry now. They’ve backed themselves into the corner of wearing a mask forever and don’t know how to get out of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, kiddiedoc and PEPPERJAX
#206
#206
utvolpj said:
Her comments during the vax mandate discussion show she does not know what is going on. She's making decisions based on bad info. The facts she presented were lies

She's choosing the bench over remote and believes that someone else choosing to not wear a ceremonial cloth puts her at risk. She can just remain there

There's no need for the sacrifice and it's an attempt to make a point. She needs to educate herself on this, leave the real stats and figure out how best to keep herself safe.
Click to expand...

Link to her choosing the bench? The article is about why she’s working remotely.

I think maybe you want to revise the rest of that now that you’re aware of this? It seems contradictory to say she’s lying but doesn’t know what she’s talking about.
 
#208
#208
evillawyer said:
From:
Neil Gorsuch rues loss of civility in public life in his new book

"In his book, Gorsuch makes a plea for kindness and manners, recounting advice from the English grandmother of his wife, Louise, who told him that he would regret things he did and things left undone, but that he would never be sorry for being kind.

And he notes that George Washington had to copy by hand all 110 rules of civility that were written by the Jesuits in 1595. In the interview, Gorsuch paraphrased one rule that he particularly liked.

“Do not speak so closely to another person with such enthusiasm that you bedew the other man with your spittle,” he said, from a safe distance. “It’s a good rule. It’s a good rule.”
Click to expand...

Does he have a habit of spitting in other people faces when he talks to them because he’s too close ? Lol
 
#210
#210
RockyTop85 said:
Link to her choosing the bench? The article is about why she’s working remotely.

I think maybe you want to revise the rest of that now that you’re aware of this? It seems contradictory to say she’s lying but doesn’t know what she’s talking about.
Click to expand...
She offered facts in court that are entirely untrue and those will shape her vote. The fact she is choosing to use these lies herself kinda makes her one by default

She wants to work from the bench. She asked others to make a useless gesture for her to do that. It would be nothing more than a photo op given the science we're supposed to follow yet she did it anyways
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
#212
#212
hog88 said:
I didn’t read the story first and that is why I gave her the benefit of the doubt in my post.
Click to expand...
You consider making up a story about her demanding that other justices wear masks to be “giving the benefit of the doubt?”

Ok yeah that checks out for somebody who demands to be addressed as Prince Douche.
 
#213
#213
utvolpj said:
She offered facts in court that are entirely untrue and those will shape her vote. The fact she is choosing to use these lies herself kinda makes her one by default

She wants to work from the bench. She asked others to make a useless gesture for her to do that. It would be nothing more than a photo op given the science we're supposed to follow yet she did it anyways
Click to expand...
Link to her asking others to do anything?
 
#216
#216
utvolpj said:
She offered facts in court that are entirely untrue and those will shape her vote. The fact she is choosing to use these lies herself kinda makes her one by default

She wants to work from the bench. She asked others to make a useless gesture for her to do that. It would be nothing more than a photo op given the science we're supposed to follow yet she did it anyways
Click to expand...
It's a win-win for her. If she convinces the others to wear masks, she can prove her power over them. If they refuse, she can claim they are heartless humans with political motives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#220
#220
evillawyer said:
I assume you're also opposed to businesses reserving the prime parking spots for the disabled. If they wanted those spots they could have gotten there when the store opened. It's not our job to accommodate the gimps. Amirite?
Click to expand...

God help us all if you were our defense lawyer in a criminal trial, we would get the death penalty for a non violent crime
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, allvol123 and NorthDallas40
#223
#223
PEPPERJAX said:
I give you props for being consistent with your beliefs however we can just agree to disagree. If I park in a handicap spot it is illegal since I do not possess a permit. If I choose not to wear a mask it is ok to make that choice without the risk of being issued a fine. How long do you plan on wearing a mask? Most have been vaxed and received a booster. The BS mask shaming is getting old.
Click to expand...

If Evil had his way, not wearing a mask would be illegal as well
 
#225
#225
utvolpj said:
The CDC unless there all in properly fitting n95s

Expert on CNN also said it
Click to expand...
And if you have facial hair forget about it. I guess we should also require clean shaven faces. Rights be damned, but then again we've so eagerly given away so many.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top