Gov. Lee announces permitless gun legislation

#26
#26
Lol at holding manufacturers and sellers liable. Do we hold Brewers and distillers liable for dwi fatalities? Do we hold car manufacturers liable for crashes that lead to injuries or deaths? Do we hold ceramic tile companies liable when people fall and hit their heads? It's truly a sad state when we want to assign blame to a company that makes a perfectly functioning, perfectly legal product.
 
#27
#27
The constitution says citizens can keep and bear arms. It doesn't say they have to know anything about them.

This is true , I could be sitting on a vault full of firearms and not care to know the first thing about their operation. Maybe I just like the sexy outline and the way they are shaped . That flat black finish or the way the chrome reflects back in NGVs eyes . 😊
 
#29
#29
The ole "hero with a gun" fallacy. More like a pussy with a gun.
Fine them hell, take their guns and take their right to vote because obviously a law breaker cannot be responsible.

What's going through the mind of someone that leaves their house with intent to break the law?
Or someone leaving their house, walking through 3 countries towards our border with intent to break the law?
 
#30
#30
The Constitution doesn't discuss permits at all, yet ww require them to build sheds and hold parades, etc. But have something that can kill a handful of people in seconds? Sure, go right ahead.
You need a permit to build a shed????

On a related note, I recently found another reason to be thankful for where I live.
 
#32
#32
Gov. Bill Lee announces permitless gun legislation; bill would increase penalties for gun thefts

I’ll start this off by saying I consider myself conservative and believe in the second amendment. This, however, is ridiculous. Carrying a gun is not something that should not be taken lightly. How or why is it asking too much to ask someone to get proper training before carrying a deadly weapon in public?
It’s not that big of a deal. There shouldn’t be a fee to the government to exercise a constitutional right
 
#33
#33
Sounds good. Now let's have sellers and manufacturers be legally liable if someone is accidentally killed by the carrier if they took no action to ensure that person was responsible. Let's keep the government out of it, and put the training and safety on the private industry.
“Responsible” lol
 
#35
#35
You need a permit to build a shed????

On a related note, I recently found another reason to be thankful for where I live.

Only inside city limits where the vampires suck the blood out of you . Outside of those you can build as many sheds as you want without anybody’s say so . Also build them behind the house so the tax assessor can’t see them just say they are just big dog houses . Lol
 
#36
#36
Sure does, as long as you ignore the part about a well regulated militia. I agree completely that it's clearly within the constitution to require a permit to carry in public.
That’s not what well regulated meant. Study up on constitutional law
 
#37
#37
The ole "hero with a gun" fallacy. More like a pussy with a gun.
Fine them hell, take their guns and take their right to vote because obviously a law breaker cannot be responsible.

What's going through the mind of someone that leaves their house with intent to break the law?
So someone is a pussy because they choose to carry a gun? And the hero with a gun isn’t a fallacy, I see examples of it every month
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Al Orange
#39
#39
Sounds good. Now let's have sellers and manufacturers be legally liable if someone is accidentally killed by the carrier if they took no action to ensure that person was responsible. Let's keep the government out of it, and put the training and safety on the private industry.

So people should be able to sue the gov for shooting deaths since we have to get the permission to purchase a firearm
 
#41
#41
The constitution says citizens can keep and bear arms. It doesn't say they have to know anything about them.

For hundreds of years fathers taught their kids to use guns.

If you really want to stop violence. Teach there is a God, pray in schools. Tell people they're more than some product of primordial stew and no different than some mindless reptile or animal.
 
#43
#43
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#44
#44
Sounds good. Now let's have sellers and manufacturers be legally liable if someone is accidentally killed by the carrier if they took no action to ensure that person was responsible. Let's keep the government out of it, and put the training and safety on the private industry.
Do we sue Ford or GM if someone gets in a DUI collision?
 
#46
#46
For hundreds of years fathers taught their kids to use guns.

If you really want to stop violence. Teach there is a God, pray in schools. Tell people they're more than some product of primordial stew and no different than some mindless reptile or animal.
You said the solution I would have suggested in the first paragraph.

More fathers in the home solves all of the world's problems.
 
#48
#48
You’re in for a rude awakening if you think people don’t carry in all those “gun free zones” outside of government buildings.

In TX the penalty for having a weapon in places using the proper signage is akin to a speeding ticket. If somebody needs to draw their weapon in order to get to go home that night, they draw their weapon, go home that night, and pay the speeding ticket sometime later. Working exactly as intended.
If I had a dollar for every time I've carried in a "gun free" zone I could retire today😁
 
#49
#49
If you are going to get special treatment under the law then regulation is reasonable. Nuclear power has limits on liability, but they are also heavily regulated. It's a tradeoff.
 
#50
#50
Is there a law that specifically prohibits suing for that like there is for firearms? Why do firearms deserve a special law?
Much like cars, firearms have to have human interaction for it to function. Unless it’s a case of manufacture negligence.
 

VN Store



Back
Top