NYYVol
Help Me To Help You
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2008
- Messages
- 15,586
- Likes
- 7
What about Hoffman?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
In general, I think it's stupid to put 70-inning pitchers in the HOF to begin with. I'd put Rivera in, but only because of what he did in the playoffs. Other than that, I wouldn't put any of them in. I just don't think you can compile enough value in only 70 innings a season to warrant HOF inclusion. Do we really want to live in a world in which John Franco has a plaque in the Hall of Fame?
But if we're going to have them in -- and given the modern obsession with the mystique of the closer, I'd say it's inevitable -- then yeah, Hoffman's got to be in. If I have to grit my teeth and put closers in there, then Hoffman, Rivera, and Lee Smith are the only modern one-inning closers I'd pick.
And as far as leaning over the plate with an elbow up goes, I always thought the single biggest factor in the magical resurgence of Barry Bonds was the body armor that baseball inexplicably let him get away with wearing rather than the steroids. He stood right on top of home plate with that shiat on, and as a pitcher you had no choice but to hit him, walk him, or throw it in his wheelhouse. There was literally nowhere left to go with the ball where you could get him out. I don't know why A) NL pitchers didn't at some point decide to throw at him every single time he came to the plate until he took it off, and B) why every single major-league batter didn't immediately follow suit when it became obvious that there weren't going to be any repercussions. Why does anybody hit without body armor on now? Why are you standing way over there in the batter's box when you could be fearlessly right up on the plate like Barry? The whole thing was inexplicable.
Thanks. I like all the same guys you guys like, pretty much. I tend to heavily favor players with stretches of real greatness; I don't care too much what their career totals end up being. To me, a guy is either a HOF-quality player or not; the numbers he compiles in his late 30s don't mean much. A HOF case should be made or not in a players prime, not his decline.
Example: Everybody in the media at this point seems to consider Chipper Jones a lock. MVP, one of the two or three best switch-hitters in history, etc. etc. Well, I've watched at least of some of the vast majority of the games he's played in his career, and I'd vote no. Jones has been a very, very good player for a long time, but I don't know that he's ever risen to the level of being a great player. I'd vote for Dale Murphy over Chipper Jones.
Counterexample: Fernando Valenzuela should be in. I don't care that he was great for only five years and then mediocre for another 12. Those five years were a hell of a lot greater than anything Bert Blyleven ever had.
I'm a sucker for the pre war age, i guess
I agree. I think Rivera gets it because when I think of dominance on the mound he's one of the first that comes to mind. I think by him getting in, Hoffman has to get in. He's another one that has built big numbers as a result of playing forever, but when you have numbers that no one else in baseball has ever had; it's almost by default you get in.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
It depends on the team how valuable closers can be.
Look at the Giants. They play so many close games because their offense is not very good. You can make the case after Posey, Lincecum, and Cain that Wilson was their most valuable player. They needed a guy to shut the door. Look in the NLDS. If the Braves had Bill Wagner, they win that series.
Most good relief pitchers can shut the door. The difference between John Smoltz and somebody like Kerry Ligtenberg in the closer's spot is way smaller than the difference between John Smoltz and somebody like Paul Byrd in the rotation.
Go back and look at, say, the Braves' 2004 season. If Smoltz the closer had gotten hurt and missed most of the year, the Braves probably still win the division. If Russ Ortiz or Jared Wright had gotten hurt, they probably don't. I just can't take seriously any pitching role which makes John Smoltz of even questionably less value than Russ Ortiz.
BTW, I am drinking some SweetWater Happy Ending. It's a must try...especially if you like Guinness...
You've prolly had it but if not...go buy some...
+ confirmed steroid user= no chance.
I don't know. Pettitte was the only confirmed steroid user to this point who has copped to it in a direct, manly way. I think that'll work in his favor. Unless some sort of Absolutely No Juicers Whatsoever consensus arises, and you certainly don't see any evidence that that's coming, then eventually some of these guys will get in.
Not that Pettitte DESERVES to get in, of course. But at that point the Confirmed User stigma will be offset by the Manned Up Manfully factor, and we'll be back to just Yankee factor + veterans committee = HOF. Eventually.
It delicious, and you start feeling good after about 2...