Hillary Clinton Uses Personal Email for State Business

#626
#626
37L1 said:
If you are going to leave out the qualifiers that got Clinton into this mess, then I can leave out qualifiers that would exclude you.

Just taking your lack of coherent logical thinking to the next illogical step.

Game on.

game-on-wallpapers-4.jpg
Click to expand...


What qualifier?

The argument from the GOP is that without an inspection of her personal computer we don't know that we have all of her work emails.

She says she turned them all over for production. They say only way to know that is to search her personal computer to see if there are remnants of any not produced.

The inevitable, logical conclusion of that reasoning is that any government official turn over all personal computers because we have only their word for it they didn't send work email from there.

Not even one. Right? Please. Of course they did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#627
#627
None of them did what Ms. Clinton did and then has had to publicly acknowledge that she did not use a government email at all, ever while Secretary of State, nor, has any of them admitted that they have deleted thousands of emails, before hand picking which ones to turn over to the State Department in response to a Congressional Subpoena.

Only once they travel that path will there be probable cause for the issuance of a subpoena.

Produce the probable cause counselor.
 
#628
#628
What an idiotic idea :eek:lol:

Go ahead and turn over the computers to LG. I highly doubt he'll be able to do much more than power one on
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#629
#629
37L1 said:
None of them did what Ms. Clinton did and then has had to publicly acknowledge that she did not use a government email at all, ever while Secretary of State, nor, has any of them admitted that they have deleted thousands of emails, before hand picking which ones to turn over to the State Department in response to a Congressional Subpoena.

Only once they travel that path will there be probable cause for the issuance of a subpoena.

Produce the probable cause counselor.
Click to expand...

No, that does not in any respect counter my point because all work emails of all government officials are public record at some point. All GOP office holders must submit to inspection all of their personal computers, by their very own argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#630
#630
utvolpj said:
What an idiotic idea :eek:lol:

Go ahead and turn over the computers to LG. I highly doubt he'll be able to do much more than power one on
Click to expand...


We could take the millions of tax payer dollars that were going to be used by the GOP to have hearings on this to hire forensic computer analysts so as to inspect all GOP private computers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#632
#632
Since we are going down the road of turning over any and all emails, communications, etc. of the GOP candidates and Hillary. Let's go ahead and have Obama unseal his college transcripts and any other items. I'm sure everything is fine and there is nothing that would pose a problem.
 
#633
#633
lawgator1 said:
We could take the millions of tax payer dollars that were going to be used by the GOP to have hearings on this to hire forensic computer analysts so as to inspect all GOP private computers.
Click to expand...

There's no need since they have actual official accounts. She conducted all sec of state business using a private email server. She also directed other state dept employees to do the same. The server should be turned over since she the one who decided to mix business and personal accounts
 
#634
#634
Jxn Vol said:
Since we are going down the road of turning over any and all emails, communications, etc. of the GOP candidates and Hillary. Let's go ahead and have Obama unseal his college transcripts and any other items. I'm sure everything is fine and there is nothing that would pose a problem.
Click to expand...


Those are not public record, like emails.

Analogy invalid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#636
#636
utvolpj said:
There's no need since they have actual official accounts. She conducted all sec of state business using a private email server. She also directed other state dept employees to do the same. The server should be turned over since she the one who decided to mix business and personal accounts
Click to expand...


Like the GOP as to Clinton, I have a hunch that GOPers have used personal email, at some point in their careers, to send a work email. Like the GOP as to Clinton, I do not believe the GOPers when they claim all work emails have been preserved.

The logical conclusion is simply inevitable. Your weak, flimsy arguments to try to defeat that conclusion are desperate because you know I'm absolutely right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#637
#637
lawgator1 said:
Like the GOP as to Clinton, I have a hunch that GOPers have used personal email, at some point in their careers, to send a work email. Like the GOP as to Clinton, I do not believe the GOPers when they claim all work emails have been preserved.
Click to expand...

your hunch is irrelevant. She admitted she only used a private email for state dept business. No one else had
lawgator1 said:

logical
Click to expand...
Yeah...
lawgator1 said:
Stop using words you do not understand.
Click to expand...

You're simply continuing to troll this forum with your ridiculous posts. It's becoming crap because of posters like you. Thanks for ruining what was a good thing
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#638
#638
utvolpj said:
your hunch is irrelevant. She admitted she only used a private email for state dept business. No one else had
Yeah...


You're simply continuing to troll this forum with your ridiculous posts. It's becoming crap because of posters like you. Thanks for ruining what was a good thing
Click to expand...


My logic is ironclad and undeniable.

And please stop with the personal insults. I'm tired of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#639
#639
Your claim for GOP candidates doesn't even rise to a level of reasonable suspicion, LG. Go ahead and try it in court, good luck with that.

The House Select Committee on Benghazi, on the other hand, has enough to get a subpoena to include Ms. Clinton's emails on the subject during the time period in question. They have been withheld until it was discovered that the State Department couldn't provide them because THEY DIDN'T HAVE THEM. . . . Ms. Clinton made sure that they didn't have them, in violation of law. She also presumably signed a form, under oath, that she turned all those governmental documents prior to leaving her office of SOS, which also involves perjury and deception.

Instead she turned over none, until she had to, in response to requests to the Department of State by the House Select Committee.

Of those emails on her server:

"Of the 62,320 emails in her account, her office said 30,490 were deemed public business, while the remaining 31,830 were deemed private."

By what and whose standards?

The logical question is:

So what is she trying so hard to hide, counselor?
 
#640
#640
lawgator1 said:
My logic is ironclad and undeniable.

And please stop with the personal insults. I'm tired of it.
Click to expand...

It's not an insult it's an ironclad and undeniable fact. Your posts are ridiculous and have contributed to the decline of this forum. You're a low information partisan hack. That's all you have to offer and it sucks
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#641
#641
Oh LG, if you feel so strongly about it, do your own FOIA request, I'm sure you know how to do that, right? Then go take them on, issue your subpoenas and I'll bring the popcorn and 3D glasses.

popcorn_stephen_colbert.gif
 
#642
#642
37L1 said:
Your claim for GOP candidates doesn't even rise to a level of reasonable suspicion, LG. Go ahead and try it in court, good luck with that.

The House Select Committee on Benghazi, on the other hand, has enough to get a subpoena to include Ms. Clinton's emails on the subject during the time period in question. They have been withheld until it was discovered that the State Department couldn't provide them because THEY DIDN'T HAVE THEM. . . . Ms. Clinton made sure that they didn't have them, in violation of law. She also presumably signed a form, under oath, that she turned all those governmental documents prior to leaving her office of SOS, which also involves perjury and deception.

Instead she turned over none, until she had to, in response to requests to the Department of State by the House Select Committee.

Of those emails on her server:

"Of the 62,320 emails in her account, her office said 30,490 were deemed public business, while the remaining 31,830 were deemed private."

By what and whose standards?

The logical question is:

So what is she trying so hard to hide, counselor?
Click to expand...

What are GOPers trying to hide by not producing their personal computers so we can see if they sent or received work emails on personal accounts ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#643
#643
lawgator1 said:
What are GOPers trying to hide by not producing their personal computers so we can see if they sent or received work emails on personal accounts ?
Click to expand...
Got that FOIA request done yet?

Or are you too busy trolling to be bothered?

Put up or shut up.

shutup.jpg
 
#647
#647
utvolpj said:
The point is ridiculous and you likely found it in the daily kos comment section.
Click to expand...


No one has yet presented a decent argument as to why I'm wrong. If we cannot take Clinton's word for it that she turned over all work emails, then why do we have to take a GOPers word for it that he never used personal email account for a work email?

Seems highly likely to me that they would have had at least some. And so, since we need to look at Clinton's, we need to look at theirs, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#648
#648
lawgator1 said:
No one has yet presented a decent argument as to why I'm wrong. If we cannot take Clinton's word for it that she turned over all work emails, then why do we have to take a GOPers word for it that he never used personal email account for a work email?

Seems highly likely to me that they would have had at least some. And so, since we need to look at Clinton's, we need to look at theirs, too.
Click to expand...

Hey, so, get the ball rollin' or are you just trollin'?

But we all know the answer to that one.

What is FOIA?

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is a law that gives you the right to access information from the federal government. It is often described as the law that keeps citizens in the know about their government.


Make your case counselor, you need to get started, otherwise you are just bloviating.
 
#649
#649
Fine, any govt official who admits their only source for sending/receiving sensitive emails is a homemade server in the closet of their home should have to turn over their hardware as well. Let's start listing names....

1) Hillary Clinton

Your turn
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top