Hillary Clinton Uses Personal Email for State Business

#702
#702
CSpindizzy said:
You ask a question I have answered repeatedly. Not sure what other point you are making.
Click to expand...

You haven't answered squat. Your biggest suggestion is for them to end all inquiries and get on with the peoples business.
 
#704
#704
lawgator1 said:
I think that sums up about how roughly 90 % of the population feels right about now.

Enough already.
Click to expand...

Again, if the admin and HC wasn't so hell bent on obfuscation there wouldn't be a need to investigate.
 
#705
#705
hog88 said:
You haven't answered squat. Your biggest suggestion is for them to end all inquiries and get on with the peoples business.
Click to expand...

You just argued against your first sentence with your second sentence. And you did not include the rest of what I said. May want to try that one again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#718
#718
CSpindizzy said:
Nothing to see here.....move along.....you don't see anything.

State: No record Hillary Clinton signed exit form - Josh Gerstein - POLITICO
Click to expand...

While the department’s Foreign Affairs Manual declares that “a separation statement will be completed whenever an employee is terminating employment,” Psaki insisted that Clinton’s departure without signing the form didn’t run afoul of any directive.

“We’re not aware of any penalty for not signing it,” Psaki said. “It’s not a violation of any rule.”


Read more: State: No record Hillary Clinton signed exit form - Josh Gerstein - POLITICO
Click to expand...

Classic - it's a rule but it's not a rule.

State has been a joke - archiving something like 60K emails out of 1 billion sent/received, firing an ambassador in part for not following email rules, never admitting they didn't even have Clinton's emails while they delayed turning them over, Clinton herself issuing a directive against using private email. Just a short list.

Why anyone wants to willingly vest more power in the Federal government is the biggest mystery of all.
 
#719
#719
BeecherVol said:
We re wasting tax dollars! Oh, noes.

Thats great.
Click to expand...

So wait... Is wasting tax dollars more or less important than Hillary using a private email?

I know what bothers me more; judging by this response and from the lack of threads about Aaron Schock I think it's ironic that the right pretends to be better stewards of tax revenue than the left.

Is it only outrageous when it's the left spending or misusing tax revenue?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#720
#720
Septic said:
So wait... Is wasting tax dollars more or less important than Hillary using a private email?

I know what bothers me more; judging by this response and from the lack of threads about Aaron Schock I think it's ironic that the right pretends to be better stewards of tax revenue than the left.

Is it only outrageous when it's the left spending or misusing tax revenue?
Click to expand...

Aaron Schock is the poster child for government excess - no doubt.

I'm assuming Beech's comment was targeted at the lame ass excuse from LG than any condoning of tax dollar wasting in general.

I'd argue that one reason so many hearings and so much time has been required is the stalling and obsfuscation by State and Clinton. Had they been open from the beginning considerably less tax dollars would have been wasted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#721
#721
volinbham said:
Classic - it's a rule but it's not a rule.

State has been a joke - archiving something like 60K emails out of 1 billion sent/received, firing an ambassador in part for not following email rules, never admitting they didn't even have Clinton's emails while they delayed turning them over, Clinton herself issuing a directive against using private email. Just a short list.

Why anyone wants to willingly vest more power in the Federal government is the biggest mystery of all.
Click to expand...

It's not just at State. And not just under Obama. If there was an audit across the board most people in IT security would have a coronary over standards and enforcement. I had friends that showed me some horror stories during the W administration. You'd think after Snowden and Manning things would have changed but in the bureaucracy most think nothing of security. When you have political appointees at the top and careerists below them no one really cares.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#722
#722
CSpindizzy said:
It's not just at State. And not just under Obama. If there was an audit across the board most people in IT security would have a coronary over standards and enforcement. I had friends that showed me some horror stories during the W administration. You'd think after Snowden and Manning things would have changed but in the bureaucracy most think nothing of security. When you have political appointees at the top and careerists below them no one really cares.
Click to expand...

I 100% agree - that's why I'm continually baffled that more citizens aren't in favor of less (or at least no more) Federal government control.

The system itself incentivizes exactly what we see.
 
#723
#723
Septic said:
So wait... Is wasting tax dollars more or less important than Hillary using a private email?

I know what bothers me more; judging by this response and from the lack of threads about Aaron Schock I think it's ironic that the right pretends to be better stewards of tax revenue than the left.

Is it only outrageous when it's the left spending or misusing tax revenue?
Click to expand...

How much of our tax dollars get wasted investigating potential criminal activities? How many dollars were spent investigating Petraus and his handling of sensitive/classified information? Shouldn't Hillary be subject to the same?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#724
#724
volinbham said:
Aaron Schock is the poster child for government excess - no doubt.

I'm assuming Beech's comment was targeted at the lame ass excuse from LG than any condoning of tax dollar wasting in general.

I'd argue that one reason so many hearings and so much time has been required is the stalling and obsfuscation by State and Clinton. Had they been open from the beginning considerably less tax dollars would have been wasted.
Click to expand...

Ehh. I'm guessing that short of confessing to being involved in the Tate family murders no amount of "openness" is going to be satisfactory to the partisan politics.

She's a democrat presidential candidate facing a republican senate and house - I believe it's a bit naive to think they won't take every opportunity possible to drag her into a hearing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#725
#725
hog88 said:
How much of our tax dollars get wasted investigating potential criminal activities? How many dollars were spent investigating Petreus and his handling of sensitive/classified information? Shouldn't Hillary be subject to the same?
Click to expand...

Actually they were investigating Broadwell when they stumbled on Petraeus' dealings. They had the evidence. The investigation was to just see the scope. With Hillary, there is no evidence just suspicion. Hillary just pops a few smoke grenades and has her minions running enough interference to keep her in the clear. She can just sit back and claim "all these times the GOP has tried to dig something up on me"...etc. etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top