We're beating up a kid who is clearly a very good basketball player. I think he has tremendous ability and will become a great player for us. He appears today to be poorly coached. He should be taking it to the hole and then dropping Js as people have to respect his explosiveness.
I think that's unfairly rough on his coaches. In highschool, his version of defense was to roam the lane and swat shots into the stands. His version of offense was to get the ball on the wing and drive into the paint and finish, with the occasional jumper or post-up mixed in for giggles. Through a whopping 13 games of college ball, despite some good spurts, that has not yet translated into dominance.
The biggest problem I see is that he is not physically strong enough to finish in the lane once he goes by his man. He also lacks the physical strength to be a good on the ball defender, and he does not do a good job of positioning himself to play solid defense, either.
These are all hallmarks of an undeveloped player, which does not necessarily equate to a poorly coached one. I hope you will see a year on campus do wonders for his strength and understanding of the game, improving both fundamentals and the intensity level it takes to compete in the SEC. If it does not, I'll join you in the "poorly coached" camp, but right now I see youth, not poor direction.
100% agree. That was the purpose of this thread. Not so much to beat up on him. Really I was just curious if others thought his development under Pearl would hurt Pearl down the road when trying to bring in big time recruits.
No, it won't. He is on the verge of averaging double digit points and 20+ minutes for a ranked (for the moment) team as a freshman. That's good production for a guy who was playing against Todd County Central this time last year, regardless of his billing. How much development do you expect through January of his freshman year?
Michael Beasleys are few and far between.