iluvsmesumdooley
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
- Messages
- 2,238
- Likes
- 614
If you think Fulmer would have done worse than 23-28 (combined records under Dooley and Kiffin), and if you think the roster would have been worse if Fulmer were still here, then I don't know what to tell you.
You do remember Fulmer only won 5 games in 2 of his last 4 years ?
I know I'm in the minority, but I really don't blame Dooley. He is what he is. 17-20 at La Tech coming off a 4 -8 season when Hammy hired him.
4-8 at LA TECH for crying out loud! What in the world was he smoking?
Blame lies with Hamilton IMO
dave hart's not any better
I was just thinking about how all of our problems would go away if we put Mike Hamilton's face on a mattress and burned it.
.I know I'm in the minority, but I really don't blame Dooley. He is what he is. 17-20 at La Tech coming off a 4 -8 season when Hammy hired him.
4-8 at LA TECH for crying out loud! What in the world was he smoking?
Blame lies with Hamilton IMO
Fulmer wasn't fired for one or two seasons. He was fired for letting this program steadily decline over a 10 period. We steadily slid to the point we are today. You better believe it was the right call. No drugs needed to come to that conclusion.
Outside of this forum and community the rest of the nation understands the reality of what happened.....it was stupid, it lacked any class of how to treat him, and we have paid dearly for it.......
During that "steady decline" 10 year period, we made it into the top-20 every single season at some point, made it to Atlanta once every 3 years, and were nationally relevant every year. Since his firing, we haven't been ranked in the top 20 a single time, have lost 6 or more games every single year, and are not even a national afterthought much anymore. No drugs needed to see the only real decline was the decline since his firing.
During that "steady decline" 10 year period, we made it into the top-20 every single season at some point, made it to Atlanta once every 3 years, and were nationally relevant every year. Since his firing, we haven't been ranked in the top 20 a single time, have lost 6 or more games every single year, and are not even a national afterthought much anymore. No drugs needed to see the only real decline was the decline since his firing.
Couldn't be more true.
What gets old on Volnation now is what I call the "Sullins Brothers argument".
Guess what - the Sullins Brothers played bigger and badder than our current 5* o-line. I don't necessarily blame them (the 5* o-line); the discontinuity of the Kiffin / Dooley years has been apocalyptic for the program and player development. Hambone, Kiffin, and Dooley are the sole sources of our meteoric decline.
It gets so old saying we were in "steady decline" when, actually, the SEC East has never been more winable than the years since 2008 and Tebow's graduation, and we were still competing for the SECC every three years.
It as if a lot of people haven't noticed we have gotten progressively worse since Fulmer and the Sullin Brothers. SMDH.
I've had people who hate Fulmer on this site tell me years ago that Tajh Boyd was no QB because he didn't start at Clemson as a freshman. That's where we are.
I really want to see what Butch and co do this weekend. Huge game.
Couldn't be more true.
What gets old on Volnation now is what I call the "Sullins Brothers argument".
Guess what - the Sullins Brothers played bigger and badder than our current 5* o-line. I don't necessarily blame them (the 5* o-line); the discontinuity of the Kiffin / Dooley years has been apocalyptic for the program and player development. Hambone, Kiffin, and Dooley are the sole sources of our meteoric decline.
It gets so old saying we were in "steady decline" when, actually, the SEC East has never been more winable than the years since 2008 and Tebow's graduation, and we were still competing for the SECC every three years.
It as if a lot of people haven't noticed we have gotten progressively worse since Fulmer and the Sullin Brothers. SMDH.
I've had people who hate Fulmer on this site tell me years ago that Tajh Boyd was no QB because he didn't start at Clemson as a freshman. That's where we are.
I really want to see what Butch and co do this weekend. Huge game.
I suppose you and I define national relevance differently. I define it as being a national championship contender, which we haven't sniffed since 2001. Oh yeah, there were a couple of preseasons where we were ranked top 5 because of our talent, but then the "perfect storm" would strike!
I would love to go 8-4 THIS year but I wouldn't be satisfied with it for years and years and that's about as good as we were ever going to be again with Fulmer at the helm.
He's a great guy and I respect him for his time here, but enough is enough about him. The fact that no one of any significance wanted him as their HC speaks volumes
You're misinformed, but then I already knew that to be a fact..
I have never understood the hate for Dave Hart. What has he done wrong? He got us a football coach that we all seem to love and has brought a great deal of excitement. He is having to clean up Hamilton's mess which is horrible. Kiffin, Dooley, Todd Raleigh, Dave Serrano, firing Fulmer(which I still don't 100% disagree with). Just like Fulmer's later years, Kiffin's bolting and Dooley's incompetence, Dave Hart is having to clean up the administrative mess he was left with and I think he is doing a great job so far. I expect even better things in the future.