ThreatLevelOrange
Wish that I was on ol’ Rocky Top
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2011
- Messages
- 3,693
- Likes
- 6,991
The only way the SEC gets 2 teams in the playoffs is if the loser of the Mich/OSU game gets blown out or it's a non-competitive game.
I think the committee will give the Big 10 the same benefit of the doubt that they gave the SEC last year. Bama was 11-1 but went to the SECCG and won, and UGA was undefeated going into the game but was #1 for most of the CFP rankings. The same can be said back in 2017, Bama did not play in the SEC title game but got in with UGA. Bama was beaten by an 11-1 Auburn who was beaten by an 11-1 UGA in the SEC title game. Our biggest wins come against teams with 2 losses and our remaining schedule does not have a top-20 team left. In other words, if Mich/OSU goes into their game undefeated and plays like they did last year where the winner won by less than 10, then the loser will get the same benefit of the doubt. Let's hope the Mich/OSU game is a blowout one way or the other. I think the 4th team will be either TCU or the PAC 12 winner with 0 or 1 loss. Also, we need TCU to slip up. Baylor did not look like a world-beater today. The playoff committee would like nothing more than to have teams representing 4 out of the 5 power conferences. It's all about the money. Take your emotions out of it. Do you think they will pick us over USC and risk losing the west coast or Texas/ Southwest viewership?
OSU (#3 Mich)
UGA (#7 LSU)
Mich (#2 OSU)
USC/TCU (USC would play #9 UCLA)
btw- I think TA&M will beat LSU- Jimbo will be playing for a lot.
I agree with your conclusion/headline. I see no scenario that we get in, absent all the teams ahead of us losing losing twice. Look forward to winning out, winning a NYD bowl, and finishing in the top 5 with a 12-1 record. And then landing a decent recruiting class and some serious playmakers in the portal.
I guess I’m in the minority when I say I’m not concerned with the Michigan/Ohio state loser seeing as we’ll both be 11-1 is having a far better resume. TCU losing helps us to 3 but I feel like we win out we are inSeveral ways we can get in.
TCU has two possible losses, at Baylor and the Big 12 CG.
A blowout win in the OSU-Michigan game.
Oregon beats the USC-UCLA winner in the PAC 12 CG.
Even if TCU wins out, we have a good shot at bring the best 1 loss team.
The only way the SEC gets 2 teams in the playoffs is if the loser of the Mich/OSU game gets blown out or it's a non-competitive game.
I think the committee will give the Big 10 the same benefit of the doubt that they gave the SEC last year. Bama was 11-1 but went to the SECCG and won, and UGA was undefeated going into the game but was #1 for most of the CFP rankings. The same can be said back in 2017, Bama did not play in the SEC title game but got in with UGA. Bama was beaten by an 11-1 Auburn who was beaten by an 11-1 UGA in the SEC title game. Our biggest wins come against teams with 2 losses and our remaining schedule does not have a top-20 team left. In other words, if Mich/OSU goes into their game undefeated and plays like they did last year where the winner won by less than 10, then the loser will get the same benefit of the doubt. Let's hope the Mich/OSU game is a blowout one way or the other. I think the 4th team will be either TCU or the PAC 12 winner with 0 or 1 loss. Also, we need TCU to slip up. Baylor did not look like a world-beater today. The playoff committee would like nothing more than to have teams representing 4 out of the 5 power conferences. It's all about the money. Take your emotions out of it. Do you think they will pick us over USC and risk losing the west coast or Texas/ Southwest viewership?
OSU (#3 Mich)
UGA (#7 LSU)
Mich (#2 OSU)
USC/TCU (USC would play #9 UCLA)
btw- I think TA&M will beat LSU- Jimbo will be playing for a lot.
After this season you should not be the one keeping our expectations in check, no one should after this season. And no, the loser of Ohio State and Michigan will not get in, we would have the better wins and better strength of schedule. So actually what you are doing is creating **** in your mind to complain about. If we win out we are in, and that is a factI'm not a troll for keeping our expectations realistic. Speaking of the day after we beat Bama, over half of Volnation chimed right around the same time. Do you really think half of the audience was here prior to beating Bama- you're mistaken.
This is the dumbest comment I have ever seen in my life. If tcu loses once they are out, if you can’t see a scenario for us gesturing in you aren’t looking very damn hard.I agree with your conclusion/headline. I see no scenario that we get in, absent all the teams ahead of us losing losing twice. Look forward to winning out, winning a NYD bowl, and finishing in the top 5 with a 12-1 record. And then landing a decent recruiting class and some serious playmakers in the portal.
Neither Michigan nor OSU have the resume to support getting in over a 1 loss Tennessee team.....at all. Whoever loses that game is completely out.The only way the SEC gets 2 teams in the playoffs is if the loser of the Mich/OSU game gets blown out or it's a non-competitive game.
I think the committee will give the Big 10 the same benefit of the doubt that they gave the SEC last year. Bama was 11-1 but went to the SECCG and won, and UGA was undefeated going into the game but was #1 for most of the CFP rankings. The same can be said back in 2017, Bama did not play in the SEC title game but got in with UGA. Bama was beaten by an 11-1 Auburn who was beaten by an 11-1 UGA in the SEC title game. Our biggest wins come against teams with 2 losses and our remaining schedule does not have a top-20 team left. In other words, if Mich/OSU goes into their game undefeated and plays like they did last year where the winner won by less than 10, then the loser will get the same benefit of the doubt. Let's hope the Mich/OSU game is a blowout one way or the other. I think the 4th team will be either TCU or the PAC 12 winner with 0 or 1 loss. Also, we need TCU to slip up. Baylor did not look like a world-beater today. The playoff committee would like nothing more than to have teams representing 4 out of the 5 power conferences. It's all about the money. Take your emotions out of it. Do you think they will pick us over USC and risk losing the west coast or Texas/ Southwest viewership?
OSU (#3 Mich)
UGA (#7 LSU)
Mich (#2 OSU)
USC/TCU (USC would play #9 UCLA)
btw- I think TA&M will beat LSU- Jimbo will be playing for a lot.
This is the dumbest comment I have ever seen in my life. If tcu loses once they are out, if you can’t see a scenario for us gesturing in you aren’t looking very damn hard.
This is the dumbest comment I have ever seen in my life. If tcu loses once they are out, if you can’t see a scenario for us gesturing in you aren’t looking very damn hard.
I don’t disagree but the OP is all over the board. He’s talking about UM and OSU both getting in then goes to talking about USC and TCU. UM and OSU’s best wins are both against 2 loss PSU. One will have a win against the other, while the other will have PSU and a nothing burger, compared to anything on our resume. We’d be in the same boat, 1 loss and no conference title game appearance. Then it’s a resume comparison of who’s the best 11-1 and it’s. It UM or OSU. I’d be worried about TCU and USC only.I agree some people are setting themselves up for disappointment. The committee really REALLY values conference champs. This is not BVS. UT wont get that chance due to playing UGA in the regular season.
You’re talking to a wall. He’s hung up on “history” yet refuses to acknowledge or recognize that a 1 loss P5 champ has been left out ONE time in 8 years and that was for an undefeated ND team.Wrong. If USC beats UCLA, they get (ranked) ND and the winner of next weeks Oregon/Utah game in the conference championship. Those are 3 high profile games to end the season. You know the committee would overlook USC losing on the road on a 2 point conversion.