Enki_Amenra
Wanna Bet?
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 41,917
- Likes
- 215,165
You blow all the **** out your azz and talk nonsense too. As of today, SMU is a P4 TEAM, PERIOD! Your opinion don't mean **** jackazz! I am done. You don't know how to state FACTS, just your idiotic opinions!!!You can yell, rant and scream all you want. (You're acting like Opie in the episode where he tries throwing a tantrum to get what he wants.)
The ACC is on the verge of collapse. They are a G level league now. SMU was a G5 team last season and landed there via expansion. The Big 12 was burning down and added G5 teams as a band-aid. In 3 or 4 years neither conference will likely exist. Especially not the ACC.
The former Colorado head coach was on CBS sports radio this week and said the same thing. That the Big 10 and SEC are the P2 and that the Big 12 and ACC are g level leagues. He said that as a Colorado alumni and former coach. He said he had go be honest and that both are one bid leagues.
That's just how it is now.
Boise State's schedule is tougher than SMUs. You can't put SMU in the playoff when they finished 2nd to a team that just lost to the 6th place SEC team.You are putting in too much reasoning over who beat who! The jackazzes in the CFP aren't even making that a top priority. That is obvious with ASU being a 12 seed and Boise being a 4 seed! Yes, Boise lost to Oregon by 3 very early. But, Boise hasn't proved **** recently. ASU has proved much more. Stop drinking and go to bed!
Well that 3 loss team that made it in was just beaten at home by a 3 loss team from the conference of the other 3 loss team in question. It's wild that these discussions are out here. SMU and Bama clearly are less than 12 hours from figuring out if they will play for a CFP or likely have loads of Opt outs for some random bowl game that players don't care about anymore.With a 3 loss Clemson in the playoffs, no way can an at large 3 loss team be invited
ASU will be the 4-seed. Boise gets the 3-seed.You are putting in too much reasoning over who beat who! The jackazzes in the CFP aren't even making that a top priority. That is obvious with ASU being a 12 seed and Boise being a 4 seed! Yes, Boise lost to Oregon by 3 very early. But, Boise hasn't proved **** recently. ASU has proved much more. Stop drinking and go to bed!
Wrong! It isn't about being biased! Would you want a two loss UT team that just lost the conference championship by a 50 yard FG with no time left on the clock to get left out over another P4 team that had 3 losses? No matter who they played and UT played. I am sure you would say it wouldn't be right! Because it wouldn't be right and you know it!!!I'm just trying to be objective here. Too many biased people on this site.
Way worse? You argued that SC should be in the playoff and didn’t Clemson only lose by 3 to them last week and they took Bama to the wire in Tuscaloosa in a 2 point loss?Texas' 2 losses were to Georgia. SMU lost to both Clemson and BYU, both of which are way worse than Georgia. Texas only lost to 1 team.
While I think it should be Ole Miss, the three loss stuff isn't a big deal. At least one, and several times twice, a 3 loss team has finished in the top 12 in the final CFP ranking in 9 of the 10 years it's existed. 3 loss teams will be a normal occurance.Alabama should not be in and that the facts. Just because they play in the SEC, doesn’t mean you can get in with 3 losses.
Just because you play a harder schedule than someone else, you still loss
Probably the later, that is why the discussion was created. If they do, they need to fire all of them and let the computers determine itWill the CFP follow their precedent and public statements or will they create a Bama only precedent for a 3rd year in a row...