Is The 1/6 Commission Coming?

#8,110
#8,110
whodeycin85 said:
It took some 2 years to indict Epps with video proof evident from day 1.... I'll bet it comes out he was an informant.... Cants wait for ticket to interview the head of DC police whom he did just before fox fired him. That interview reportedly the DC head annoys there was significant FBI presence during J6.
Click to expand...
Does it matter that Ray Epps donated (with checks drawn from a personal checking account that he has had for more than 20 years) the maximum allowable FEC amount of $2,500 to Donald Trump's Presidential Election campaigns in both 2016 and 2020?

You are so absorbed in your stupid conspiracy theories that you don't take the time to even get the baseline facts. Epps was a die hard MAGA member.

... and why would the FBI need an informant for crimes which were easily documented on numerous different videos in multiple locations throughout the Capitol grounds on 1/6? That is such a damn stupid thing to say.
 
Last edited:
#8,112
#8,112
BowlBrother85 said:
Does it matter that Ray Epps donated (with checks drawn from a personal checking account that he has had for more than 20 years) the maximum allowable FEC amount of $2,500 to Donald Trump's Presidential Election campaigns in both 2016 and 2020?

You are so absorbed in your stupid conspiracy theories that you don't take the time to even get the baseline facts. Epps was a die hard MAGA member.

... and why would the FBI need an informant for crimes which were easily documented on numerous different videos in multiple locations throughout the Capitol grounds on 1/6? That is such a damn stupid thing to say.
Click to expand...
Your cult ignorance shows because that doesn't mean he is not an informant or that isn't paid by the FBI....if he was a hard core trumpet do you really think it would take 2 years with video evidence of him inciting??? Then convicted more with less evidence faster..ask yourself why??? Sober If you can manage it
 
#8,113
#8,113
whodeycin85 said:
Your cult ignorance
Click to expand...
LOL. Coming from a Trump bootlicker ... that is rich. The Republican Party's current unconditional support of Donald Trump can only be described as cultish at the moment. It is a Cult of Personality. It meets every single criteria.

whodeycin85 said:
that doesn't mean he is not an informant or that isn't paid by the FBI
Click to expand...
There was no need for the FBI to have an informant on the Capitol grounds on 1/6. The video evidence of the crimes underway was substantial.

whodeycin85 said:
if he was a hard core trumpet do you really think it would take 2 years with video evidence of him inciting???
Click to expand...
That is truly ignorant of what has been taking place. Yes, there are still people being tried and convicted for crimes at the moment. The guy who beat a cop over the head with a flag pole was just convicted for it last week. You don't know what the hell you are talking about ... which is usually the case.
whodeycin85 said:
Then convicted more with less evidence faster..ask yourself why??? Sober If you can manage it
Click to expand...
Get a life, if you can manage it.
 
#8,114
#8,114
whodeycin85 said:
Your cult ignorance shows because that doesn't mean he is not an informant or that isn't paid by the FBI....if he was a hard core trumpet do you really think it would take 2 years with video evidence of him inciting??? Then convicted more with less evidence faster..ask yourself why??? Sober If you can manage it
Click to expand...
Also, the FBI would never place a citizen in harms way like that. If they wanted eyes and ears on the Capitol grounds on 1/6, they would have sent one of their own agents down to do it. They would not have used a private citizen. Your theory is full of holes.
 
#8,116
#8,116
hog88 said:
LOL
Click to expand...
You think the FBI would employ a private citizen, instead of using one of their own agents, to participate in a riot? That is stupid.

Now, to be clear ... I don't think they would have done either. There was no reason to. The crimes were taking place on the Capitol grounds where there are tons of surveillance cameras. An "informant" was never going to be necessary in order to ascertain what was taking place.
 
Last edited:
#8,117
#8,117
BowlBrother85 said:
You think the FBI would employ a private citizen, instead of using one of their own agents, to participate in a riot? That is stupid.

Now, to be clear ... I don't think they would have done either. There was no reason to. The crimes were taking place on the Capitol grounds where there are tons of surveillance cameras. An "informant" was never going to be necessary in order to ascertain what was taking place.
Click to expand...

Yes, I think they would. Whether they did or not is another question but I absolutely believe the FBI would employ a private citizen and put them in harms way to get what they wanted.
 
#8,118
#8,118
hog88 said:
Yes, I think they would. Whether they did or not is another question but I absolutely believe the FBI would employ a private citizen and put them in harms way to get what they wanted.
Click to expand...
Well, that is just wrong ... but believe whatever you want. It's your problem; not mine.

... and once again, there was no reason to. An informant was not going to give them information which wasn't already going to be available to them by way of surveillance footage. It is a stupid theory.
 
#8,119
#8,119
FBI employs infiltrators, and yes, they are predominatly Citizens

" a person who secretly becomes part of a group in order to get information or to influence the way the group thinks or behaves: The infiltrator was identified and killed. "
 
#8,120
#8,120
Caculator said:
FBI employs infiltrators, and yes, they are predominatly Citizens

" a person who secretly becomes part of a group in order to get information or to influence the way the group thinks or behaves: The infiltrator was identified and killed. "
Click to expand...
They would not employ a private citizen to infiltrate a violent group ... they would use one of their own, or they would try to obtain the services of someone who was already a trusted member.
 
#8,121
#8,121




^^^^ This is the Arkansas man who beat a cop with a flag pole *during a peaceful protest* after dragging him down some steps. He was sentenced to 4 years in prison last week. The logic that because it took so long to bring him to justice, means he must be an FBI plant is ridiculous ... unless you want to believe that this guy is an FBI plant as well. I have no doubt that some of you idiots will do just that.
 
#8,122
#8,122
They not only employ Citizens for undercove work , they also vioilate Citizens's rights


SPEEDY TRIAL ACT OF 1974 - DEFINING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT. THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT OF 1974 MANDATES THAT, BY 1980, THE PERIOD OF DELAY IN ALL FEDERAL AND DISTRICT COURTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 DAYS, SUBJECT TO A VARIETY OF EXCLUDABLE PERIODS OF DELAY.
 
#8,123
#8,123
BowlBrother85 said:
They would not employ a private citizen to infiltrate a violent group ... they would use one of their own, or they would try to obtain the services of someone who was already a trusted member.
Click to expand...

Yes, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) does use citizens as confidential informants (CI) and undercover agents
 
#8,124
#8,124
BowlBrother85 said:
Well, that is just wrong ... but believe whatever you want. It's your problem; not mine.

... and once again, there was no reason to. An informant was not going to give them information which wasn't already going to be available to them by way of surveillance footage. It is a stupid theory.
Click to expand...

I haven't done the research but I suspect several FBI informants have been murdered through the years, especially in mob investigations. So no I don't think the FBI is squeamish in the least about putting civillian informants in harms way.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top