Pacer92
Youneverknow
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 15,826
- Likes
- 18,572
More false arguments. Rape and enslavement arent on the table.Ok. So can the victor rape their women? Take their gold? Destroy their landmarks? Why stop at just seizing their land? What's the moral principle that justifies seizing the land but not raping the women and enslaving the population?
In everyday life, if you punch me first, and I counterpunch and win, do I get your car?
Ok. So can the victor rape their women? Take their gold? Destroy their landmarks? Why stop at just seizing their land? What's the moral principle that justifies seizing the land but not raping the women and enslaving the population?
In everyday life, if you punch me first, and I counterpunch and win, do I get your car?
More false arguments. Rape and enslavement arent on the table.
You continue to ignore that both sides are guilty. The Palestinians attack the Israelis about as much as the other way around. It's not like the Jews are picking on Nepal.
The Palestinians had the option to become citizens just like thousands of other Arabs did.
Lol. Selective history argument. Only the history that helps your argument matters to you.Crimea chose to return (key word "return") to Russia.
Oh ffs, if you're going to pull the "God promised them that land" argument, I don't think we can debate. That's not a "public reason" that can be offered and accepted by any neutral observer.
Public reason - Wikipedia
And regardless, that doesn't answer my question as to when the US has been cool with action like what Netanyahu is proposing.
More false arguments. Rape and enslavement arent on the table.
You continue to ignore that both sides are guilty. The Palestinians attack the Israelis about as much as the other way around. It's not like the Jews are picking on Nepal.
The entire Middle East isn’t called Israel because we stop their retaliation. We’ve had our say. We should stop paying everyone over there and mind our own business.Israel probably wouldn't be there if they hadn't received US military aid in the past. Seems like if we're chipping in green, we should have a say.
The entire Middle East isn’t called Israel because we stop their retaliation. We’ve had our say. We should stop paying everyone over there and mind our own business.
If we were to do that then we could not stop Israel from killing everyone around them.
I'm looking for you to give me the moral principle that yields the conclusion that in a defensive war, if you win, you can do one thing that's typically considered immoral (taking someone's land or property), but not something else that's immoral (raping women, enslaving the population, exterminating the population).
Self preservation. Not sure if its moral or not. But if something continues to attack and try and kill you at some point you have to remove the problem. Gang green, breast cancer, that one guy who cut off his own arm in the desert. You are doing something that is generally considered very bad to live.I'm looking for you to give me the moral principle that yields the conclusion that in a defensive war, if you win, you can do one thing that's typically considered immoral (taking someone's land or property), but not something else that's immoral (raping women, enslaving the population, exterminating the population).
And what argument would you make?
Your link shows that the jews predated the arabs at one point. What caused that? This is just the latest turn in a long dance. And you are complaining because you dont like the current results.