AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,590
- Likes
- 42,430
You don't lose the team, or a large majority of it, in Year 2, Game 1 (this actually goes back even to last year) without a massive leadership failure, and leadership starts with the head coach. If tons of players are quitting on this staff this early in his tenure, which is a theory the last 3 games performance definitely supports, that is a symptom of the disease, not it's cause.
If you've ever gone through management changes, then you almost certainly would recognize that the new guy has some real challenges. Unless the old regime was really bad, a lot of the staff will always resist change.
Look at a football team. Except for twenty-some players that Pruitt brought in the first year (and even many of those were actually Butch recruits) every player on the team was a Butch player. Maybe some were happy to see Butch go, but you can always assume with younger people their first allegiance is to the first boss ... just the facts. The NCAA doesn't let a new coach do a reset and find a new team - he has to make do with what he's got - happy or not. Some coaches have a great personality and can win people over easily - but they don't produce because they can't coach worth beans. It's never going to be easy for a tougher coach to take a team that's been muddling through without effort and turn them into a disciplined team. Pruitt will likely find the way, but it may not be with the people on this team this year. For the record, I think JG is a problem ... maybe not an anti-Pruitt problem, but not a leader in a leadership position.