volfanhill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 35,027
- Likes
- 61,269
This is his attempt to escape the stupidity of the corner he painted himself into once again.I thought I was the kidnapped in the scenario.
If my kidnapper is taking naps in the other room, I’m definitely waiting for that before I strike and attempt to escape.
If you’re defining rules of engagement for 3rd parties seeking to liberate the kidnapped, then your position is easier for me to digest.
I doubt I would grant as much leeway to the kidnapper, though.
This is a continuation on McDad's policy of total war on those who take American hostages, so I was thnking about the actions of those out to rescue the kidnapped.I thought I was the kidnapped in the scenario.
That makes sense.If my kidnapper is taking naps in the other room, I’m definitely waiting for that before I strike and attempt to escape.
If you’re defining rules of engagement for 3rd parties seeking to liberate the kidnapped, then your position is easier for me to digest.
I doubt I would grant as much leeway to the kidnapper, though.
The law is pretty simple.Understood.
But I’m allowing an incredibly wide latitude to those seeking to rescue the kidnapped.
Your opinion is whatever you want it to be but that doesn't mean you're correct.That is not what caveman means and Muslims aren’t a monolith anyway, plenty of practicing Muslims believe in women’s rights
That’s the 4th definition on that page and like I said, doesn’t apply to all Muslims anywayYour opinion is whatever you want it to be but that doesn't mean you're correct.
Source: Google.
What does caveman mean in slang?
(informal, figuratively, derogatory) Someone, especially a man, who has regressive, old-fashioned attitudes, particularly with regard to women; someone opposed to change or modernity.
Isn't that basically what we do now..we did it Iran..Russia (griner)...it works so well to stop other from taking hostagesSo reward them for kidnapping our people? That seems silly.
Let it be known through out the land if you kidnap Americans, then in exchange, America will no longer provide funding for your enemy.
Seems really unwise actually
Like this stuff ^ was all fine to people, but me saying Muslims aren’t cavemen or lesser people is what other posters had a problem with hahaThe Islamist world understands two things, and two things only: Money, and fear. If you don't want to pay them then you have to kill them. Paying them is only temporary, they keep acting out to get more and more. We only half-azz kill them, just like Israel. You have to make them afraid of you if you want a long-term solution, and this can be done, but no one has the stones to do it.
It is still an accepted definition. Which means your earlier claim (That is not what caveman means) is false.That’s the 4th definition on that page and like I said, doesn’t apply to all Muslims anyway
No, like white supremacists who think they are better than a large segment of the population, should be able to restrict the rights of a large segment of the population, and believe that a large segment of the population shouldn't have a voice in their countries governance. That kind.White supremacists meaning people pushing the idea that Muslims are uncivilized savages who are inherently inferior?
There're a case to be made that those who would take away the basic human rights and freedoms of others are inferior. The govt systems pushed by most Muslim countries are absolutely inferior if basic human rights and freedoms are important.If we really have people here arguing that Muslims are inferior people, that would explain a lot of this thread