85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 32,603
- Likes
- 64,134
Nash's point is that the numbers claimed by the IDF in your AP are not "active combatants" it's "militant" Palestinians, which could just mean they are schoolboys who support the idea of fighting their oppressors. It's not the same thing, and the distinction matters, even if you consider it quibbling.
IDK, maybe they mean active combatants and do not understand what militant means, but knowing the IDF, one way or another, the 17k is a ******** number.
I am pretty sure the IDF knows what “militant” means, though, based on my time in the ME, I am also sure it at means something different to them than to me. The English language is fun like that.Nash's point is that the numbers claimed by the IDF in your AP are not "active combatants" it's "militant" Palestinians, which could just mean they are schoolboys who support the idea of fighting their oppressors. It's not the same thing, and the distinction matters, even if you consider it quibbling.
IDK, maybe they mean active combatants and do not understand what militant means, but knowing the IDF, one way or another, the 17k is a ******** number.
One of them has posted that Israel should be more concerned about the people of Gaza than the elected leaders of the people of Gaza and should not shoot at the Hamas combatants hiding behind their own people.This will fall on deaf ears, and you will only get a deflection, if any response at all.
Americans weren't in the Palestinian position. We and the British were in the Israeli position and the Cherokee et al were in the Palestinian position. The American Revolution would be like a civil war between Zionist factions in Israel.What? Think about the absurdity of your post.
Americans were in the Palestinian position from 1775-1783. The difference is our leaders didn't flee to safety while their people were fighting, they invested their own treasure into defeating the bull instead of robbing their people, they used what foreign aid that was sent to help their people instead of stuffing it in their pockets. Also instead of hiding behind their women and children they faced the biggest bull on earth on the battlefield.
The past 24 years hasn't been mostly open hostilities. The events since October last year add a great big amount to that 2400.That only 2400 minors were killed (and given that Palestinian figures don't distinguish combatants, thus a 17 year old with an AK counts the same as an infant in his mother's arms) over the course of 24 years, most of which have been spent during open hostilities, is actually quite amazing.
Where was that?I am pretty sure the IDF knows what “militant” means, though, based on my time in the ME, I am also sure it at means something different to them than to me. The English language is fun like that.
I’ve never had a school kid strap a bomb on and try to blow me up, but I have friends who have had that happen. Those friends don’t regret what they did to survive, and to help their fellow troops survive, but they can’t forget what they had to do either.
War is Hell.
Israel killed over 2,000 Palestinian kids under 17 from 2000 to January 2022, making up a human shield narrative for every civilian Israel kills is stupid and exhausting
To then finding out it is real and immediately pivoting to “wow amazingly low”Show your work for this stat.
Per your link there has been 2387 minors killed by IDF forces between Sept 2000 and April 2024. So they average (if the stats are correct) about 100 minors killed per year, in the US the police have averaged killing about 25 per year. It's pretty amazing it's so low over there considering how many times over the last 24 years it has been an active war zone.
That only 2400 minors were killed (and given that Palestinian figures don't distinguish combatants, thus a 17 year old with an AK counts the same as an infant in his mother's arms) over the course of 24 years, most of which have been spent during open hostilities, is actually quite amazing.
All that is red herring. The real issue is people here trying to view the situation there as if it were here.I just enjoy the fact that it went from “show your work, that number seems too high to be real”:
To then finding out it is real and immediately pivoting to “wow amazingly low”
I disagree with this.Your lack of self-awareness is almost impressive.
I disagree with this.
@NashVol11 likes to argue. He enjoys the debate and not necessarily the discussion. I think he’s very much like @evillawyer in that he will sometimes say things he doesn’t necessarily believe because he’s having fun trying to score points.
Edit: I’m saying that knowing that I will sometimes do that as well
Civilians died in every war. Period. Full stop.How about bombing wedding parties?
Or bombing cars carrying aid workers and then bombing the first responders?
The Sheltering and aiding of Hamas is the part these people ignore...Yes we locked horns but the leadership and populace situation was night and day different. If what you say is true and the average Palestinian in Gaza is an innocent non-combatant it wouldn't be the people "locking horns" with the bull it would just be active Hamas members and the people wouldn't be sheltering, aiding and supporting them.
This is one of the instances he’s referring to, how exactly did Israel “take every responsible precaution” by giving the go-ahead for an ambulance to pick up a 6-year-old, then blowing it up and killing her, then lying and pretending they weren’t thereCivilians died in every war. Period. Full stop.
If Gaza didn’t want civilians killed; they shouldn’t have started a war.
Israel takes every responsible precaution to avoid civilian casualties. Hamas on the other hand, deliberately attacks music festivals and kills teenagers. Then cynically hides behind their own civilians in a reprehensible plan to increase their own civilian deaths to garner international sympathy.
Hamas started this war. They don’t get to complain when it doesn’t go the way they want.
Rajab and her family were fleeing Gaza Citywhen their vehicle was shelled, killing her uncle, aunt and three cousins, except for Rajab and another cousin who contacted the Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS) to ask for help while noting that they were being attacked by an Israeli tank. The cousin was later also killed and Rajab was left stranded in the vehicle for hours on the phone, as paramedics from PRCS attempted to rescue her. Both Rajab and the paramedics were later also found killed on 10 February after an Israeli withdrawal.
Israel claimed that there weren't any troops present in the neighborhood and denied carrying out the attack. However, this was refuted by investigations relying on satellite imagery and visual evidence, which concluded that a number of Israeli tanks were indeed present and one had likely fired 335 rounds on the car that Rajab and her family had been in, with tank operators being able to see that the car had civilians including children in it.[5] The Forensic Architecture investigation also concluded that an Israeli tank had also likely attacked the ambulance that came for Rajab.
Mistakes happen in war. Remember this? Would you also claim that the US is wantonly killing civilians?This is one of the instances he’s referring to, how exactly did Israel “take every responsible precaution” by giving the go-ahead for an ambulance to pick up a 6-year-old, then blowing it up and killing her, then lying and pretending they weren’t there
Killing of Hind Rajab - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
This is one of the instances he’s referring to, how exactly did Israel “take every responsible precaution” by giving the go-ahead for an ambulance to pick up a 6-year-old, then blowing it up and killing her, then lying and pretending they weren’t there
Killing of Hind Rajab - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org