85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 31,878
- Likes
- 62,424
I'm not "mad about the comparison", I'm pointing out that it's objectively insane to invent a measurement no one uses in order to downplay 9/11, of all things, by comparison. Can't wait for you to go out of your way to misunderstand this too lolI did. You’re mad about the comparison. I laid out the reason for the comparison.
SugarVol being Exhibit A lmao. "BSing your way into 20 9/11s" being rewritten as "comparing the scope" as we speakIf, say, Rashida Tlaib compared anything to 20 9/11s people here would never stop talking about it. Israel does it and we get this "you know this, I mean obviously it's 20 9/11s" ass kissing hahaha
It’s not a downplaying of 9/11. It’s presenting the Israeli loss of life in the context of the size of 9/11 & 10/7.I'm not "mad about the comparison", I'm pointing out that it's objectively insane to invent a measurement no one uses in order to downplay 9/11, of all things, by comparison. Can't wait for you to go out of your way to misunderstand this too lol
This is easy to do. 1,200 died on 10/7. Roughly 3,000 died on 9/11. 20 9/11s is used car salesman material, and these same people would not be okay with Palestinians invoking 9/11 every time Israel kills 50+ of themIt’s not a downplaying of 9/11. It’s presenting the Israeli loss of life in the context of the size of 9/11 & 10/7.
How many Pearl Harbors is that?It’s not a downplaying of 9/11. It’s presenting the Israeli loss of life in the context of the size of 9/11 & 10/7.
Here let me try and help you understand lol -
What the Palestinian Terrorists unleashed at that music festival was the equivalent of 20 Columbines.
Doctor treating freed Hamas hostages reveals unprecedented abuse: 'We have to rewrite the textbooks'
Dr. Renana Eitan shared details from treating more than 15 hostages at the Tel Aviv Medical Center, revealing the horrific conditions the hostages endured.www.foxnews.com
I get the comparison and understand what you are talking about by calling it twenty 9/11s...9/11 was a specific terror attack, the largest in US History.
10/7 was a specific terror attack, the largest in Israeli History.
Barbaric, singular attacks. Carried out by murderers. With nothing but deliberate murder on their minds.
But by all means, get mad about them comparing the scope.
“The center of gravity is the civilian population and if you drive them into the arms of the enemy, you replace a tactical victory with a strategic defeat.”
LLoyd Austin
I see you alot bringing up the history between the Jews and Palestinians. Do you view the attack on 10/7 as a continuation of a war that's been happening?I get the comparison and understand what you are talking about by calling it twenty 9/11s...
But here is my question... why do you only stat the clock at 10/07 and not 100+ yeas earlier with the Balfour Agreement and Sykes-Picot?
Just shocked, that you too are confused and butthurt over this.How many Pearl Harbors is that?
How many Guernicas has the IDF's response been so far?
There does seem to be a awful lot of fuss over what, as best I can tell, is taking one country's worst terrorist attack and, for the sake of context, basically making a per capita comparison. I'm not sure exactly how accurate various such comparisons are by the math but the idea behind it doesn't seem particularly controversial to me.Just shocked, that you too are confused and butthurt over this.
Comparing the largest Terror attack in American history to the largest Palestinian Terror attack in Israeli history.
When the reports were first coming in, people were trying to put into context the size and scope of what had just happened. What Israelis had just suffered.
A variation of - “This would be like the US suffering 40,000 deaths in 9/11” was one way people tried to put it in context.
That’s where the 20x 9/11 comes from.
I'm not confused and I'm not butthurt. The scope is evident if the numbers are to be believed.Just shocked, that you too are confused and butthurt over this.
Comparing the largest Terror attack in American history to the largest Palestinian Terror attack in Israeli history.
When the reports were first coming in, people were trying to put into context the size and scope of what had just happened. What Israelis had just suffered.
A variation of - “This would be like the US suffering 40,000 deaths in 9/11” was one way people tried to put it in context.
That’s where the 20x 9/11 comes from.
They are probably responding to people of your ilk that seem to be glossing over what actually took place on 10/7. Or giving context, to one of the 90% of the world that is oblivious to what has taken place.Has anyone ever seen someone else try to say [disaster with way fewer deaths] was much worse than [disaster with more deaths] because it happened in a country with a smaller population? Wtf is this lol