Israel vs Palestinians

[Orangeslice13]

Well that's very convenient. At any rate most of them left or converted to other faiths, and other people moved in, all long long ago. It's not copacetic to abandon land for a thousand years and then claim it and clear out the rightful inhabitants.
If you get up to speed on your history you'll notice that it wasn't so much the Palestinians who couldn't live in peace as it was the European settlers.

Lol

 

[whodeycin85]

Well that's very convenient. At any rate most of them left or converted to other faiths, and other people moved in, all long long ago. It's not copacetic to abandon land for a thousand years and then claim it and clear out the rightful inhabitants.
If you get up to speed on your history you'll notice that it wasn't so much the Palestinians who couldn't live in peace as it was the European settlers.

Are you of the belief that all lands should return to thier orginal owners whomever that may be???

 

[Orangeslice13]

Are you of the belief that all lands should return to thier orginal owners whomever that may be???

Do you mean all the illegally occupied lands we call the United States?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Identify one single acre of inhabited land anywhere on earth today that wasn’t at some point owned by someone else.

I can't name one.

Now WTF does that have to do with what you said?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

I will defer to the ultimate unbiased authority
View attachment 627375

And that land covenant effectively ended in 69-70 AD.

 

[EasternVol]

Just because you keep posting that, doesn't make it true.

Duh, it's true because it's true.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Well that's very convenient. At any rate most of them left or converted to other faiths, and other people moved in, all long long ago. It's not copacetic to abandon land for a thousand years and then claim it and clear out the rightful inhabitants.
If you get up to speed on your history you'll notice that it wasn't so much the Palestinians who couldn't live in peace as it was the European settlers.

You've done it now...

 

[EasternVol]

there’s that inferior propaganda you like so much

So what part of it is incorrect?

 

[Orangeslice13]

And that land covenant effectively ended in 69-70 AD.

Lolololol

Your Ramadan fasting has you confused.
A little more than normal.

 

[EasternVol]

Are you of the belief that all lands should return to thier orginal owners whomever that may be???

It's impossible to determine 'original owners' given thousands of years, of habitation, migration, etc.

 

[Orangeslice13]

So what part of it is incorrect?

All of it

 

[EasternVol]

Do you mean all the illegally occupied lands we call the United States?

There was no international law in place governing land acquisition when we acquired our territory. So 'illegal' doesn't apply.

 

[EasternVol]

You've done it now...

Ya think?

 

[EasternVol]

All of it

Good one.

 

[jp1]

And that land covenant effectively ended in 69-70 AD.

Your story is as confused as Eastern's. But, for the sake of argument, let's suppose you are correct. Reconcile this statement in context of this thread......."Russia can and will take what part of Ukraine that it wants".

 

[jp1]

It's impossible to determine 'original owners' given thousands of years, of habitation, migration, etc.

 

[Orangeslice13]

There was no international law in place governing land acquisition when we acquired our territory. So 'illegal' doesn't apply.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Good one.

No….it’s absolutely inferior quality

 

[OrangeTsar]

And that land covenant effectively ended in 69-70 AD.

Not quite. The Bible predicted that Israel would be scattered (which did happen post 70 AD) but that God would gather them from the 4 winds back to their homeland in the last days.
And like everything else God promised, it came to pass.
And the book of Revelation tells us that no one will ever dislodge them ever again. And then the entire world will gather against them in The Valley of Armageddon in which history comes to a close, with Israel still standing and the entire world ruled from Jerusalem by a risen Jewish carpenter.

 

[whodeycin85]

It's impossible to determine 'original owners' given thousands of years, of habitation, migration, etc.

I understand that but you have referenced several times that Isreal took over that area..as have others..so I've always been curious by people who view land that way.

 

[EasternVol]

I see you're easily amused. Can you prove the 'original owner' of anywhere?

 

[EasternVol]

View attachment 627420

You sure set the record straight there.

 

[EasternVol]

No….it’s absolutely inferior quality

So disprove it.

 

[EasternVol]

I understand that but you have referenced several times that Isreal took over that area..as have others..so I've always been curious by people who view land that way.

The events of 1948 and after happened in modern times. People have deeds and international law theoretically applies.

 

[jp1]

Well that's very convenient. At any rate most of them left or converted to other faiths, and other people moved in, all long long ago. It's not copacetic to abandon land for a thousand years and then claim it and clear out the rightful inhabitants.
If you get up to speed on your history you'll notice that it wasn't so much the Palestinians who couldn't live in peace as it was the European settlers.

And that land covenant effectively ended in 69-70 AD.

I see you're easily amused. Can you prove the 'original owner' of anywhere?

Apparently you can.