KB5252
Repeat Forward Progress Victim
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 38,507
- Likes
- 37,915
I would normally agree with you, but lets take a look at this. Eric Adams just came out and clearly stated that the Columbia situation was influenced and manned by non-students and an outside organization. What we are seeing is the same Marxist group that gave us the BLM destruction and many more violent instances are exploiting this antisemitism for their own agenda. Have you seen that the tents given out all across the country? They are very expensive and basically all the same. How do thousands of the same Palestinian weave sheets end up all over the place at the same time? So, what we have is an organization that is pouring gasoline on small fires all over the country. Criminal acts, destruction of property and many other things that are against the law are coming about due to this organizations actions. That sounds like a RICO act prosecution, and the Feds are the ones that would look into that. I absolutely don't think the Fed will do anything here because our current leftist administration likes all of this.I hope we can all agree the feds need to stay the hell out of this.
No it's perfectly valid because it's a statement of fact, just because something was prohibited or allowed 100, 40 or even 20 years ago doesn't really matter. We all must follow the law and the university has policies that they can enforce if they choose. They chose........ You don't agree with it, just because you didn't agree doesn't make it wrong..... In fact law and order aren't on your side here.Yes. What did you think occupying meant? They’ve seized the building, barricaded it with furniture, even kept the dean from leaving in 1968 and those are all protests Columbia (and many others) now celebrate.
Bold is an insane reach that makes it seem like you’re just grasping for any argument on that side, whether or not it has any merit
we need to chill out on the attempts to tie this to Marxist groups, BLM and other groups which were a part of other unrest events to what's going on. If evidence comes to light of it, great. Until then, I don't think it is necessary or helpful.I would normally agree with you, but lets take a look at this. Eric Adams just came out and clearly stated that the Columbia situation was influenced and manned by non-students and an outside organization. What we are seeing is the same Marxist group that gave us the BLM destruction and many more violent instances are exploiting this antisemitism for their own agenda. Have you seen that the tents given out all across the country? They are very expensive and basically all the same. How do thousands of the same Palestinian weave sheets end up all over the place at the same time? So, what we have is an organization that is pouring gasoline on small fires all over the country. Criminal acts, destruction of property and many other things that are against the law are coming about due to this organizations actions. That sounds like a RICO act prosecution, and the Feds are the ones that would look into that. I absolutely don't think the Fed will do anything here because our current leftist administration likes all of this.
The question will not be answered because he won't come right out and say it.....because he knows it's wrong.he obviously thinks the answer is yes. Now lets extrapolate this logic.
Can the protestors go into any business and just overtake and camp out in said business and refuse to leave?
a large force is the best way to minimize the potential for violent resistance. protestors were given every chance to cease their unauthorized occupation of buildings and areas.
Agreed, while I believe the NYPD when they say there were outside influences it doesn't mean the tin foil brigade was right.we need to chill out on the attempts to tie this to Marxist groups, BLM and other groups which were a part of other unrest events to what's going on. If evidence comes to light of it, great. Until then, I don't think it is necessary or helpful.
Those happened more at CCNY, which is right down the street from Columbia:
Nice try. You just proved the police are 100% in the right. In the first clip, someone falls around a lot of police officers. Once the guy is on the ground the officers don't go after him. What is not seen in the clip is HOW the person ended up there. This clip was edited in a manner to make it look bad. If the police had thrown him to the ground, that would have been part of the video. Sorry, the first video is total BS. I like the second one even better. You can visibly see the individual fighting with the police officers. Guess what happens when you fight with the police? You are physically restrained with force. I know there are so many people out there that are making up BS to fit their looser agendas. That was too easy to debunk
Sorry, it is the truth. I understand it hurts sometimes. Many things about this have already come to light, as I made reference to.we need to chill out on the attempts to tie this to Marxist groups, BLM and other groups which were a part of other unrest events to what's going on. If evidence comes to light of it, great. Until then, I don't think it is necessary or helpful.
There are quite a few white adults on here who 100% believe the Israel / IDF / Zionist lines. So maybe.Are white kids more susceptible to being brainwashed and radicalized than other traditional Americans, or is this age based? I ask because it appears half of the protesters are white.