Orangeslice13
Shema Yisrael
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 95,180
- Likes
- 109,539
I don't think anyone in this thread has said every protestor should always have full immunity or anything close to that, rather that it is a bad look for the school to have an excessive number of cops flooding their campus (and in the case of UCLA, shooting with rubber bullets etc.) that they called on their own students
Not difficult at all to make an argument that us not sending money to Israel is more just than the current situation. It also doesn't have to be a carbon copy of the CRM anyway for King's words to apply. Did he make that rule or did you?
You clearly did not, between acting like "being on the side of law and order" matters above all else and waiting for a black-and-white moral issue with an accompanying "protest" that fits neatly within the boundaries set by police and the state, you are the exact -- to a T -- person he was talking about in that letter
Why are you defensive? At Columbia, 80/112 were students and that includes arrests "inside and outside Hamilton Hall," which could mean anything.Sure
We just repeating dispelled rumors as fact now?Asked to leave. They refused.
Destroyed property and then asked to leave. They refused.
Informed them they have to leave or will be removed. They refused.
Harassed Jewish students and Jewish sympathizers, asked to leave again. They refused.
5 of these "protesters" surrounded and attacked a female Jewish student, rendering her unconscious. Asked to leave the area again, they refused.
How many opportunities must be given to these individuals? The protest ended when the beatings began.
These are the exact people he is talking about lol. "Within reason" always excludes whatever the current protest isExcept I'm not on the side of law and order above so else. I'm on their side within reason.
I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;"
UuuuhhhhWhy are you defensive? At Columbia, 80/112 were students and that includes arrests "inside and outside Hamilton Hall," which could mean anything.
They pulled in a lot of external numbers to come up with "nearly half," which people like you misremember as "more than half." That's the whole point. Stating the actual accurate Columbia number shouldn't make you defensive unless you care about tribalism more than truth
Why do you think this hasn't been verified or reported by anyone reputable?SMH. One Palestinian / Hamas sympathizer can clack off a vest at the protest and this guy on twitter would ask if it really happened.
Why do you think this hasn't been verified or reported by anyone reputable?
Her own words were, “My sister’s flag fell on the floor… I was going in to try and get it, and when I was down getting her flag I was shoved down to the ground and I fell back hitting my head.”
You can see in the video that she crouches down presumably to pick up the flag, gets pulled back by her own people and falls backwards.
Would you have preferred sending a much smaller response in?I don't think anyone in this thread has said every protestor should always have full immunity or anything close to that, rather that it is a bad look for the school to have an excessive number of cops flooding their campus (and in the case of UCLA, shooting with rubber bullets etc.) that they called on their own students
While understand the point you're making, I also think that "we are sending way too many cops because if we send too few, our cops will fully abandon their duties and just start shooting" is a pretty dubious justificationWould you have preferred sending a much smaller response in?
Do you remember what happened just the other day when pro-Pal’s surrounded a couple of jumpy cops?
In an outside setting….
During the day….
Send a small unit into an overrun building. At night.
And let a couple of jumpy cops get surrounded by masked rioters in there.
You’d be screaming bloody murder over what very likely could have happened next.
They were clearly erring on the side of too many vs too few. And for good reason.While understand the point you're making, I also think that "we are sending way too many cops because if we send too few, our cops will fully abandon their duties and just start shooting" is a pretty dubious justification
It’s moronic that this is an argumentThey were clearly erring on the side of too many vs too few. And for good reason.
The NYPD had no idea what waited for them inside that building.
And if they had been surrounded - they would have responded.
A smaller force is likely greeted much differently than the actual force that was sent.
They were clearly erring on the side of too many vs too few. And for good reason.
The NYPD had no idea what waited for them inside that building.
And if they had been surrounded - they would have responded.
A smaller force is likely greeted much differently than the actual force that was sent.