OHvol40
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2008
- Messages
- 8,687
- Likes
- 4,780
What?
That jump is WORSE than the jump required to say "people who are against abortion want to go back to the days when women were the property of men and had no rights."
Plus, you seem to have conveniently overlooked the "TEAM OF DOCTORS" part.
Oh, so what do you recommend to do about America’s gun violence epidemic then?
Be careful, you’re intruding on personal liberties there. I very much doubt many of the gun owners here want smart technology on all their guns.Have parents teach their children to respect human life (sort of hard to do when the state condones the termination of nearly a million lives per year).
Require gun manufacturers to incorporate "smart" technology to require individual owner recognition in order to operate the weapon system.
In my line of work when you’re implementing some new solution to a problem it has to meet some requirements.Better parenting and discipline in schools. Firearms familiarization and safety instruction in schools. Quit excusing bad behavior as mental illness and prescribing drugs to kids.
In my line of work when you’re implementing some new solution to a problem it has to meet some requirements.
1. There has to be evidence it’s effective.
2. It has to be measurable in some way (quantitative)
3. It has to be tracked, aka it’s effectiveness has to be monitored and evaluated.
4. It has to be realistic as far as implementation, logistically, cost-effective, etc…
5. It has to be uniformly instituted, or else requirements 2&3 are moot.
I’m not saying your general ideas are bad, there are substance to them… but now I ask myself, how do we implement those proposed solutions meeting these requirements?
It’s still an opinion based on personal anecdotes, no matter how old you are. Show me something measurable with appreciable association, and you have my attention.Those of us who are old enough have seen the results of that approach and today's approach, and can confirm the earlier approach had better results.
I'm still waiting on him, or anybody, to answer why this is bad for women's sports, but allowing men to pretend to be women so they can win isn't. Or, how it's wrong for the government to intervene in health choices here, but they were cheerleading it about the shot. Of course, being hypocritical in their beliefs because of politics, none will answer.Because everything should be politicized to keep you in power, right?
Have parents teach their children to respect human life (sort of hard to do when the state condones the termination of nearly a million lives per year).
Require gun manufacturers to incorporate "smart" technology to require individual owner recognition in order to operate the weapon system.
lol.....So somehow killing babies is a right, but slavery is abhorrent. LOL
You don't have to 'say it' Chief. Errybody here with any kind of functioning brain knows what you are all about.lol.....
I said nothing of the sort.
I was close to 100% positive you would misunderstand my post. In fact, I actually had included "make sure you think this through before responding with your immediate gut reaction because it is almost always wrong", but then deleted it.
and..
You didn't answer the question at the end of my post.....that's the key part.
Be careful, you’re intruding on personal liberties there. I very much doubt many of the gun owners here want smart technology on all their guns.
You’re more than welcome to teach about the sanctity of human life, that’s important. How about those of us who respect human life and believe that humans aren’t humans until about 24 weeks gestation (the point of viability)? Should your beliefs about when human life begins supersede mine? What right do you have to legislate your belief system on me and my family when I have a perfectly reasonable belief that dividing cells doesn’t become “alive” until it’s viable outside of gestation?
Why don’t you just stick with your beliefs, I’ll stick with mine, and keep your nose out of my personal business. Stop trying to impose your “morals” on people who don’t care to hear what you have to say on the matters that affect their life, and doesn’t affect yours.