clarencepeabody
Not a very well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2011
- Messages
- 914
- Likes
- 1,643
Admittedly I figured it was just another DA kid that went out and did something stupid. This seems a lot more bizarre. Can we just admit that it’s weird as hell this kid goes into the wrong apartment? Completely apologetic while at the same time telling McCullough not to be a dick?You're funny: You claim that the guy who mistakenly walked into the wrong apartment broke the law--but the man who assaulted him should be let off with no charges. I think you've got things backwards, man. A whole lot of unspoken, "hey, he's a football starter and we need him" rationalizing going on in this thread! It's deep.
You are wrong. He definitely followed him out of the apartment and sucker punched the kid
"He certainly could have handled it better." Ya think? He violently assaulted a man who mistakenly entered his apartment and was no way a threat to him. You knew this would bring out all the self-defense types. It's not hard to assess whether somebody is a threat or not or just made a mistake.
GhostVol you again are making factual assumptions without having all the facts. Teeth could have been knocked out by the fall down the steps. You are basing everything on what was reported several hours after it happened by:
1. Someone who was intoxicated at 3 pm Sunday afternoon to the point that he did not know which building he just came out of.
2. Someone who was unconscious for a period of time due to a blow to the face, a fall down a flight of stairs, a combination of both, or something else. That in and of itself is cause for memory deficits.
3. Someone who, several hours later, told his "story" to police. If his "story" was supported (corroborated) by other witnesses, the incident/arrest report would have likely said so.
4. Someone who appears to be a Gator fan.
The "victim's" whole story has more holes than a block of swiss cheese. Tank did the correct thing keeping his mouth shut when it was obvious he was going to be arrested. You do not read someone their miranda rights unless they are being arrested. Note the report says he chose not to talk after being given his miranda warning. Him talking would not change him being arrested. It just would have given the police a chance to try get him to incriminate himself. You are naive to think otherwise.
That's a pretty idiotic take.You're funny: You claim that the guy who mistakenly walked into the wrong apartment broke the law--but the man who assaulted him should be let off with no charges. I think you've got things backwards, man. A whole lot of unspoken, "hey, he's a football starter and we need him" rationalizing going on in this thread! It's deep.
Oh I have no qualms calling out BS when it’s this kind of stuff.Yeah. I’m not much on calling other posters out but it’s really, really crappy to make that kind of statement if you don’t have definitive proof. And it’s not in the report that was released unless there’s a different one than I’ve seen.
I wonder how much of it has to do with just the social acceptance of alcohol in general and blacking out. If the kid was out of his mind on meth or heroine i think it would likely be viewed differently."Mistakenly?" You can read minds? Or worse, you chose to believe this guy carte blanche? Nothing to do with a football player, just a citizen minding his own business and being interrupted by a drunk coming in his home. Let a drunk walk into a home with children and start popping off. That's a short expiration date.
Every bit of that may well be true, with one caveat....
I'm pretty sure there was a point during the whole kerfuffle when he could have simply locked the door and gone back to whatever it was he was doing rather than throwing hands with some drunk fool.....
If it turns out said "drunk fool" waltzed in and started being belligerent (as he may well have been, I'd be pretty belligerent if I walked into what I thought was MY apartment and found random people sitting on my couch watching my TV and eating my food) then McCullough was completely in the right to rough dude up and toss him out the door.
But here's the question I can't quite wrap my head around.... Why wouldn't that be the very. first. thing. he told the cops when they got there? I get the whole "clam up, it's the cops" attitude but in the above instance?
If that's what happened (above) I'm telling the cops, the neighbors, calling my position coach and telling him, calling Coach Heupel and telling him, calling my boss (if he has a job outside of school) and telling him / her, calling..... I think you get the point.
Exercising his right to remain silent just seems fishy at best.....
He’s FOS and he knows it. If such corroboration existed jaylen would already be off the team.So @Rickyvol77 gonna chuck 3 grenades in here and vamoose?
It’s just remarkable, the whole thing. He wasn’t out doing anything wrong, trouble literally walked in his front door and found him.
To me it’s as simple as none of this would have happened had a drunk guy not walk into his apartment while he was minding his own business hanging out with his girlfriend. Maybe he could have handled it better, I don’t know. But it’s an undeniable fact he wasn’t out looking for trouble or asking for any of this when it happened.
Good points madeWith all due respect, it is the way things are. This is basic "Law & Order" stuff. If you are criminally accused, public perception or "looks" to third parties are the last things you should worry about. "Everyone" doesn't need to know your twist on what happened and you can bet that law enforcement is going to try to find evidence to support a charge and a conviction, if possible. It is their job. The only two things that should matter to you are: 1) by law you are presumed innocent until you are proven guilty; and 2) you have a right to remain silent. Ever hear the warning, "anything you say can and will be used against you?" Those words are rock solid true. If you are accused of a crime be respectful to the officers and be silent. Your excuses, explanations, and even non-sensical nervous chatter, can provide the proof needed to convict you.
And by the way, that same ex-President you referenced, when given the recent opportunity to fully explain his situation under oath, he cited the Fifth Amendment and refused to answer questions nearly 500 times in one single deposition. I bet he has pretty experienced lawyers who gave him that advice, despite "bad" looks and "speculation." If this kid committed a crime, it needs to be proven not assumed based on third party reports.
Yeah, he did the smart thing in not speaking. Given the little that is available, I do not see how a jury convicts on this. This is also not like he went out looking for trouble somewhere. At most, I would think a good lawyer could get this to a low misdemeanor plea.
He certainly could have handled it better but right now, all we have is what the guy who got punched said. Any chance that he may not have been entirely forthcoming and truthful in his testimony?
So I dont think this will ruin him, the question is whether he will stay on the team. No doubt he is unlikely to play this Saturday though.
That’s the drunk person’s recollection of events. You read HIS narrative.Good grief. The guy who mistakenly walked into the apartment wasn't looking for trouble either, was he? Based on what I've read, he apologized. So the easy and obvious reaction would be, "hey, no problem," and then you watch the guy walk out of the door. I'm pretty sure that's what any halfway sensible person would do. But drunk young people tend not to be very sensible sometimes.