Option B is BS and a total false choice. We all know full well Holly was fired because of her last four years, not her first three in which the accomplishments listed in Option B occurred. We were there and there's also alot of live video available, so we know crazed fans didn't just one day rise in irrational rebellion against a high achieving coach.Let's put it like this. If you're a coach like, let's say Matthew Mitchell, and you make $1.3 million a year at a major power 5 school with all the resources needed to compete for titles. What would you do?
Option A: Stay at Kentucky, make $1.3 million. In an above-average year, you finish 3rd in the conference, make the Sweet 16, and get a contract extension.
Option B: Go to Tennessee for $1.5 million. Go to the Elite 8 twice, the Sweet 16 once and you're on the hot seat because fans will compare your average year only to Pat's best. You don't make the Final Four in a four year stretch and people call for your job. IF you get an extension, people complain because you haven't done enough to deserve one.
Which option are you going to pick? 9 out of 10 coaches are going to pick A. This isn't the only program in America that will pay well and give a coach everything he or she needs to thrive anymore. Better hope #10 ends up being a winner.
Since you seem to need a recap, after having some success early, arguably because she still had Pat's players, Holly took a nosedive, deepening at an alarming rate each successive year. Not just losing games in previously unheard of ways to unheard of opponents, but clearly having lost the lockerroom as well. Program shrouded in disjointed unhappiness and lack of improvement.
I'm pretty sure no potential hire who's been awake, alert, and paying attention recently is quaking in their boots over the fans "mistreatment" of poor Holly Warlick. Can't see us quite having the power or influence for that.