WoodsmanVol
It takes wisdom to understand wisdom.
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 17,382
- Likes
- 13,471
Beyond you citing what Trump said about Ted Cruz’s father as a way to bring Trump into it, how does Trump fit into the equation? To my knowledge it was just one of a million dumbass remarks made by Trump just to try and gain political advantage. Nothing else.So you say. The JFK topic is very encompassing. But nevermind, truth avoiders will always duck and cover when truth comes their way.
Beyond you citing what Trump said about Ted Cruz’s father as a way to bring Trump into it, how does Trump fit into the equation? To my knowledge it was just one of a million dumbass remarks made by Trump just to try and gain political advantage. Nothing else.
To each their own.
I'm not saying it's a certainty.
However, I referenced what I find to be a well-researched study of the possibility that doesn't rule it out. This is more than one will find on some of the other wild theories folks swallow hook, line, and sinker.
Bottom line is people want to believe it took a massive conspiracy to kill a popular president, when in fact it takes one nut job.
Additionally, I'll add there's at least as much, if not more, evidence of a conspiracy to kill RFK and MLK Jr.
That all the **** blown out of his head to the right front indicates a rear entrance.Look, first off, this is a .gov link you are posting, so obviously it is going to have a govt narrative. Second, it is building its case about the shots based on frames of the edited Zapruder film.
What is this saying?
That all the **** blown out of his head to the right front indicates a rear entrance.
For fecks sake man...there isnt even an exit wound on the front of his head OR neck...exit wounds are ALWAYS larger than entrance wounds in mammals...bit there is an entrance wound above JFKs right eye as well as statements from the Drs who first examined the body (before the feds threatened, pushed them away ètc) that he died from a massive chunk of skull blown out the back of his head. ANY PROJECTILE coming from behind that blew a big chunk out the back of his head would have blown half his face off into the frontseat of the damn car. That is not debatable. It is physics. Nobody who kills things with a rifle could come to the BS conclusion that the government did. I just do not see how they could.
Good pointJust for reference because even as much as I’ve been around firearms I forget the hog legs these 6.5x52 were throwing out …
View attachment 524381
I have killed MANY deer in my lifetime using leadcore expandable projectiles that would impart more energy per grain than a FMJ round. The entry wound NEVER explodes like the front of his head did. I am not arguing that there may or may not have been someone else, I am just saying that the shot that blew the front of his head out came from behind. My question is, where did the shot come from that hit him when both hands came up to his neck. If there is a shot from the front, it seems to me that what ever caused him to raise both arms came from the front and pushed him into the seat. Also in that massive report, it says that the impact was not fully inelastic and that muscle spasm due to a kill shot to the head coupled with the acceleration/motion of the vehicle could have caused the movement backwards. Most deer that I have killed with a head shot spasm for several seconds following impact.
I have killed MANY deer in my lifetime using leadcore expandable projectiles that would impart more energy per grain than a FMJ round. The entry wound NEVER explodes like the front of his head did. I am not arguing that there may or may not have been someone else, I am just saying that the shot that blew the front of his head out came from behind. My question is, where did the shot come from that hit him when both hands came up to his neck. If there is a shot from the front, it seems to me that what ever caused him to raise both arms came from the front and pushed him into the seat. Also in that massive report, it says that the impact was not fully inelastic and that muscle spasm due to a kill shot to the head coupled with the acceleration/motion of the vehicle could have caused the movement backwards. Most deer that I have killed with a head shot spasm for several seconds following impact.
You are absolutely right about one lone nutjob but when you have another nutjob kill the first nutjob WHILE IN POLICE CUSTODY and only 2 days after he supposedly commits the crime of the century....ah, you are probably on firmer ground believing in a visit by Santa Clause than that these were just 2 random nutjobs acting alone.
The fact that your belief hinges on the head moving "back and to the left" shows how little research you've actually done on the topic.
The bullet slowed down coming through the windshield as it entered right below his necktie and got lodged there.I have killed MANY deer in my lifetime using leadcore expandable projectiles that would impart more energy per grain than a FMJ round. The entry wound NEVER explodes like the front of his head did. I am not arguing that there may or may not have been someone else, I am just saying that the shot that blew the front of his head out came from behind. My question is, where did the shot come from that hit him when both hands came up to his neck. If there is a shot from the front, it seems to me that what ever caused him to raise both arms came from the front and pushed him into the seat. Also in that massive report, it says that the impact was not fully inelastic and that muscle spasm due to a kill shot to the head coupled with the acceleration/motion of the vehicle could have caused the movement backwards. Most deer that I have killed with a head shot spasm for several seconds following impact.