There seems to be a considerable amount of misunderstanding surrounding the John Wall eligibility issue. This is an amateur status issue not an institutional violation issue. That means that the NCAA Committee on Infractions is not involved. This issue is between the NCAA and the individual (John Wall) - not the University or any of its staff.
The unresolved issue with the NCAA centers around documentation supporting evidence that Wall's AAU Coach (Clifton) was reimbursed for any expenses he incurred while accompanying John to "unofficial visits" to the institution in which he signed his LOI. This includes any meals, lodging costs, etc.
It is my understanding that the issue of Clifton's agent status while an AAU coach is now cleared. If not, then other players on this AAU team such as Ryan Kelly of Duke would be under investigation as well.
why do kentucky fans feel they need to come over here and explain this issue?
Yea it surprises me sometimes how Pearl and Cal "supposedly" do the same thing but these "Vol" fans tend to take it personally when someone says bad things about Cal.
Bottom line: Is Calipari completely innocent of any shady business while coaching and recruiting? Probably not, you would be hard pressed to find a coach that is. Is he on the same level as Kelvin Sampson like a lot of people on here seem to think? No, and it is silly to claim otherwise.
At least he had major accomplishments to vacate. More than can be said for some of his rivals in the East.I agree to a point. But I don't think Calipari should be just lumped into a category with all the other coaches because everybody is supposedly doing it. That is not the case with Calipari; all of his major accomplishments have been vacated by the NCAA. Thus, he is not just like all the other coaches in the NCAA, but he's not on the level of Sampson either. Calipari has a reputation for being a slimeball by almost everyone except the fans of the school that he is at. That is not the case with most coaches.
I am not defending him at all if he did something wrong he and the program should be punished. I stated a few days ago that I liked Cal, til he got to Kentucky. The problem is, our fans like to act like we are the choirboys of the SEC, and we aren't
Hell, I didn't see any of you guys calling Kiffin a cheater when Bryce Brown's amateur status came into question. Glass houses guys
I agree, we should cheat and win something major just so we can say we accomplished something.
I'm far more forgiving of those who produce bigtime results.I've acknowledged the fact that both coaches do their fair share of cheating, but it seems like when Cal is called out as a cheater there seems to be more defense come to his aid, then if someone calls Bruce a cheater on here.
I'm far more forgiving of those who produce bigtime results.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Surely you don't think Izzo gets all those Flint guys just becaue he's an excellent tactician. I'm sure it has nothing to do with how tight he is with the high school coaches and grassroots guys in that area.There are no rewards for being "honest" and having integrity in college bball.. the only way to be successfull is to be a heck of a coach (Izzo) or use your "connections" to land the top talent (Cal)... Bruce better start meeting new people..
Surely you don't think Izzo gets all those Flint guys just becaue he's an excellent tactician. I'm sure it has nothing to do with how tight he is with the high school coaches and grassroots guys in that area.
Posted via VolNation Mobile