Oh? An 8/4 Gruden trumps an 8/4 Dooley? How smart would that be considering we would have to empty the coffers to get him? Especially on an untested SEC coach. Don't hand me the BS about a SB ring. Coach Fulmer has a NC ring and that wasn't good enough.
Friend, do you just see what you want to see rather than what was actually written?
I'm pretty sure he meant that he would trade a loss or two THIS year for Gruden rather than have Dooley hang on by a thread by winning 8 underwhelming games. So would I.
How is a Super Bowl BS??? My goodness. The NFL is HARDER than the SEC, so I'm sure Gruden would fare just fine.
And we fired Fulmer TEN YEARS after he won the NC. My goodness, it's not like we fired him a year or two after winning it.
Friend, you may not want Gruden, and that's fine. But you aren't supporting your case by using shoddy logic and unreasonable arguments in your posts in this thread.
Gruden or not, I want Dooley gone. He just can't and won't get it done.
Let's tease out your logic a bit:
1. Gruden won a SB, but that's offset because Fulmer won a NC and was still fired ten years later. (What a glaring non-sequitor!)
2. Fulmer winning a NC still didn't save him from being eventually fired.
3. Gruden winning a SB didn't save him from being eventually fired.
4. We shouldn't want Gruden, a SB-winning coach, because he was fired for having an average record in the NFL after winning said SB. And because he has no experience of coaching in the SEC.
5. Instead, we should stick with a losing-record coach in Dooley who has won neither a NC nor SB. Has SEC experience, but abysmal.
I'm not sure what kind of argument you are making--it really makes no sense, whatsoever.
How does Fulmer winning a NC have any bearing on Gruden? Because someone won a championship doesn't mean they are a great coach? Fine. But it also doesn't support your argument that a coach who wins a championship is a bad coach. Very peculiar use of logic in that one.
Secondly, if Fulmer and Gruden received little grace even after winning championships, then WHY should Dooley, who has won nothing, receive ANY favors? He doesn't merit any.
Basically, your own arguments show why we should fire Dooley.
On Gruden's lack of SEC experience: If a former SEC-title winning coach was going to coach a team in the Sun Belt, why would a Sun Belt fan claim that the coach's experience in the SEC was not as good as coaching experience in the Sun Belt? You see how faulty this is, right?
Perhaps a different example: let's say a professor at an Ivy League university left to teach at a small college. The small college doesn't turn him away because he doesn't have experience teaching at a small college; rather, they hire him because he has the experience in a higher level of difficulty and prestige.
It's the same with Gruden. His experience as a Super Bowl winning NFL head coach is MORE valuable than just some experience coaching in the SEC.
To summarize: Your arguments are fallacious, Dooley has failed and needs to be let go, and hopefully Gruden will be our next coach.