I'm just trying to wrap my mind around everyone's infatuation with Gruden? While the idea sounds good, I'm just not sure I see where all you are coming from?
I have compiled some data to back up my theory.
1. Gruden's HC record is 95-81. A .540 winning %
2. His first 2 years as HC of the Raiders, he went .500
3. He did win a Super Bowl in his first year at TB, but
how much of that success was because of what
Tony D left behind?
4. He then proceeded to go 7-9 and 5-11 the next 2
years (How long will Vol fans put up with that?)
5. He later posted a 4-12 season (and this?).
6. His record as HC at Tampa Bay was 57-55, .509%
7. Has he ever had to recruit against SEC teams, or
really ever had to recruit at all?
8. He was only at Tennessee for 1 season as a
graduate assistant. I understand he met his wife
here and owns land in E. TN, but what the he!! does
that matter?
All I hear is the "Grudenites" harping on Dooley's record, when Gruden's record isn't all that great. Maybe I don't see what all of you see, so please, correct me where I'm wrong. (and yes, I know Dooleys record is 31-36, sub
.500, but this is not a defending Dooley thread)