bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 73,783
- Likes
- 49,533
That everyone and their momma, except you, knows that there is no decent defense played this year or any year. If there was a decent amount of defense you'd see people who had the first clue about basketball going regularly.
That everyone and their momma, except you, knows that there is no decent defense played this year or any year. If there was a decent amount of defense you'd see people who had the first clue about basketball going regularly.
There you go again, "decent defense", I never used this term. Simply said its better than years past, reading comprehension is definitely a trait you don't have.
I'll take that as a white flag.
Enjoy watching the RTL next year. If defenses keep progressing, you might see scores in the 20s.
If there was NO defense scores would be in the 200's and shots wouldn't be missed very often. I saw multiple blocks and steals, and some teams actually communicating and switching on the defensive end. Of course these are all terms you don't know so trying to explain is pointless.
Go watch soccer, I hear there's some great 0-0 games.
So switching on a ball screen is good communication that only happens in good defensive leagues?
Keep this up please.
Once again your reason comprehension is the level of a 2nd grader, which judging by your replies is probably pretty accurate. Go watch Harlem gkobetrotters that no defense, the RTL is nowhere near lacking the defense the gkobetrotters are.
The local Y has the same amount of defense that the RTL does, if not better. They communicate on ball screens and I've seen a block or two. That good defense?
And could you have found a dumber example?
Lmao, let the guys at the local Y get out there then, they'll be laughed off the court. There's a reason you're no name players in the RTL aren't the ones blowing up. Yes the D is lacking, but If you think you could go out there and drop 20 against bobby maze I'll gladly take you up on that.
Pretty sure that was touched on as to why we were there in the first place. Secondly, if there was a modicum of defense, coaches would show up. Not regularly of course.
Pretty sure that was touched on as to why we were there in the first place. Secondly, if there was a modicum of defense, coaches would show up. Not regularly of course.
Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't coaches (UT coaches at least) barred from going to the RTL? I mean Pearl was able to come just because his son was playing at the time, but he could only watch Steven's game. But honestly, I think they aren't able to attend d/t NCAA regulations. Now, high school coaches are allowed to come IIRC.
I don't really want in the middle of this, but I have to ask. What coaches exactly would be showing up at games predominately comprised of kids that are either already in school or have completed their eligibility? I could see a high school coach showing up to maybe watch on old player or Martin (or one of his staff) swinging by, but the notion that if these games were played at a high level then big name coaches (or no-name coaches for that matter) from other schools would attend them is kind of far fetched. What would be the point?