Kavanaugh Confirmation

[0nelilreb]

I saw 2 with around 700K. Considering she lives in California that should buy her and her "husband" a nice little trailer.

If they wait 6 more months they can get a whole lot of Tesla’s for that lol .

 

[NorthDallas40]

Intent and outcome are 2 totally different things.

No they’re exactly the same - Luther

 

[evillawyer]

LOL, you are pitiful!!!

LOL, you are pitiful!!!

I appreciate your show of pity towards me. Means a lot. Don't change a thing

 

[NorthDallas40]

Thx. Let me know when that has any bearing on Kavanaugh's yearbook related lies.

Thx let me know when fart gags and drinking games in high school have any bearing on a SCOTUS confirmation.

 

[DancingOutlaw]

You know, as much as I hate to say it, the DNC actually brought good arguments (okay, maybe valid is a better term) against Gorsuch. They didn't agree with some of his case decisions, I can understand and appreciate that.

This time the committee is digging into his ****ing high school yearbooks. For real?

At what point do you even say "this is too much and ya'll need to move the eff on..."?

I think we can all agree we are all the same people we were at 17.

2018 me would happily punch 2000-2008ish me.

 

[Grand Vol]

I do wonder if this is something much bigger and deeper than just a conservative leaning SC, R vs W, and petty partisanship. I try to keep the conspiracy theorist in me chained in the basement, and look at everything with a critical eye, but I wonder if this all out offensive has something to do with the draining of the swamp, deep state, treason and military tribunals. This SC interview is just too weird...

You know LG isn't going to reply...

 

[evillawyer]

Thx let me know when fart gags and drinking games in high school have any bearing on a SCOTUS confirmation.

They don't. But lies about them do.

 

[BeecherVol]

Thx. Let me know when that has any bearing on Kavanaugh's yearbook related lies.

At least we ve moved on from sexual assault to yearbook posts.

Cat sliding down a tin roof.

 

[Orange_Crush]

You know LG isn't going to reply...

I'll survive.

 

[hog88]

I think we can all agree we are all the same people we were at 17.

2018 me would happily punch 2000-2008ish me.

2018 me would kick 1980's me's azz up between my earlobes.

 

[Grand Vol]

They don't. But lies about them do.

You know what else has bearing on the hearings?

Who leaked Ford's letter...

 

[NorthDallas40]

They don't. But lies about them do.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

I appreciate your show of pity towards me. Means a lot. Don't change a thing

You are welcome! Provide evidence that Kavanaugh is guilty! I mean hard evidence not some retard Twitter poster.

 

[DancingOutlaw]

They don't. But lies about them do.

And isn’t it true Mr Kavanaugh you told your mother you took out the trash on Wednesday night when Mrs. Buchanan testified to seeing you carry out the trash on Thursday morning? You’re a disgusting human being Mr. Kavanaugh who doesn’t deserve to judge a pie eating contest.

 

[Grand Vol]

I'll survive.

I was actually being centric and talking about myself lol

 

[Orange_Crush]

2018 me would kick 1980's me's azz up between my earlobes.

I'd go to jail for kicking 1980 me's rear. I would hunt 1990-1996 me down just to stomp a mudhole, though.

 

[zeppelin128]

He was calm for the Fox interview and his critics said "an innocent person would be more angry/outraged". When he shows anger and outrage his critics say "see, he's violent and his temperament is not consistent with a SCOTUS seat.

It's a complete no win situation.

All I can say is if I were him and believed my innocence my performance during the hearings would have been almost identical.

I never watched the Fox News interview, and don't care about it at all. If he was calm and collected in the interview, he should have done the same in the hearing. That's jmho.

There is no "right or wrong" about his demeanor, we just have a difference in opinion on temperament. And that is okay, people handle situations differently. As I've said a hundred times, that shouldn't disqualify him from approval.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Answer this.

Is bashing someone's head in with a rock justified (moral) or unjustified (immoral)?

It always depend on intent.(means) the ends is someone has been bashed in the head with a rock. You are already supplying the end in that scenario.
A. I decide to smash someone in the head because he's killing someone else, moral
B. I decide to smash someone in the head to steal all his money, immoral

 

[0nelilreb]

So you can break the "thou shalt not kill" commandment to save a life, but not the "thou shalt not bear false witness" commandment to save hundreds of lives? That's your stance?

He said thou shalt not . not maybe , not possibly , not cute little what if’s . he said SHALL NOT . What you do after that and how you reason it one way or the other will be between you and him if he asks you why . I have a feeling you won’t be trying to play a word games then .

 

[NurseGoodVol]

No they’re exactly the same - Luther

It's 2 different sides to a scenario, how can this be confusing
( means ) i intend to hit someone in the head they...
(End) Either get hit in the head or
(End) I'm a bad shot and miss
Means is wrapped up in intent.

 

[BeecherVol]

I never watched the Fox News interview, and don't care about it at all. If he was calm and collected in the interview, he should have done the same in the hearing. That's jmho.

There is no "right or wrong" about his demeanor, we just have a difference in opinion on temperament. And that is okay, people handle situations differently. As I've said a hundred times, that shouldn't disqualify him from approval.

Both settings were drastically different. Just like the drastic differences in the 2 hearings with Ford and K.

He was heading into questioning in the hearing by one group that not an hour earlier had predetermined his guilt before they had asked him the first question. They didnt even wait for the post game pressers.

 

[txbo]

Easy to say. I bet most of us could scrap together a good prepared statement for testimony but once you get in front of the cameras and the world and you're blatantly being falsely accused of a "crime"..we might go off the rails a bit.

Especially if you have a distinguished professional record beyond reproach but your high school year book is on the big screen at one of the most powerful deliberative bodies in the world.

 

[Obsessed]

I do wonder if this is something much bigger and deeper than just a conservative leaning SC, R vs W, and petty partisanship. I try to keep the conspiracy theorist in me chained in the basement, and look at everything with a critical eye, but I wonder if this all out offensive has something to do with the draining of the swamp, deep state, treason and military tribunals. This SC interview is just too weird...

That was very interesting.

 

[NorthDallas40]

It's 2 different sides to a scenario, how can this be confusing
( means ) i intend to hit someone in the head they...
(End) Either get hit in the head or
(End) I'm a bad shot and miss
Means is wrapped up in intent.

I never claimed Luther was intelligent. Don’t kill the messenger... unless of course the ends justify it!

 

[0nelilreb]

SIAP, but worth posting again for the lulz

Grassley taunts Bernie Sanders in salty response to Kavanaugh probe letter

HA and Down Goes the Socialist !