Kavanaugh Confirmation

[utvolpj]

Why would he be vindictive?

He made it sound that way. Maybe he won't but I don't believe him. I'm not sure what happened with the assault but he absolutely lied about some things. Little things like that chip at the credibility of a job that shouldn't have those questions. Way too important a position

 

[0nelilreb]

Tell that to the people claiming "we won" without having a clue what this guy stands for. It was even swept under the rug by the GOP once they were told to get with the team's choice.

So you wanted who ?

 

[hog88]

He made it sound that way. Maybe he won't but I don't believe him. I'm not sure what happened with the assault but he absolutely lied about some things. Little things like that chip at the credibility of a job that shouldn't have those questions. Way too important a position

He lied? Prove it or STFU.

 

[volinbham]

Good grief, this is what I mean by team sport. I've said he should get confirmed, I've said there was not enough evidence to disqualify him (that is called supporting presumption of innocence), I've said this was a shitshow of political theater, and I've said nothing in his career on the bench shows me unprofessionalism.

sounded like you were saying supporters only cared about R vs D - my investment in this was firmly about principle that applies regardless of team.

I wasn't referring to your position but rather the suggestion that supporters or detractors only cared about the letter after the name of the nominator.

 

[utvolpj]

Do you have any basis to assert he is vindictive in the 300+ rulings he’s made on the DC circuit?.

His statements this past week are what I'm discussing

 

[volinbham]

His statements this past week are what I'm discussing

One statement - one time outweighs a career's worth of rulings that shown zero vindictiveness?

 

[NorthDallas40]

His statements this past week are what I'm discussing

And you’re totally ignoring his judicial record to date as a matter of convenience for your assertion of vindictiveness.

 

[utvolpj]

He lied? Prove it or STFU.

We all know he did. Spicy food? Farting? Come on, even you know that's true

 

[0nelilreb]

He made it sound that way. Maybe he won't but I don't believe him. I'm not sure what happened with the assault but he absolutely lied about some things. Little things like that chip at the credibility of a job that shouldn't have those questions. Way too important a position

How about oh I don’t know a sentator is that too important of a job to have a credibility issue ? People act like this one man is going to bust in amongst the other judges an tell them what and how to vote . He’s replacing Kennedy a conservative republican is replacing a conservative republican . Next up AB now you will change the court with her .

 

[utvolpj]

And you’re totally ignoring his judicial record to date as a matter of convenience for your assertion of vindictiveness.

And so are those claiming this is a victory for the Constitution. Going to call them out too?

 

[GAVol]

"what goes around comes around."

I think if you look at the context, I think a good case could be made that he's not vowing revenge as much as he's decrying the hyper-politicization of the confirmation process and the impact it's sure to have on future confirmations.

 

[hog88]

His statements this past week are what I'm discussing

You want to discuss his views on the 4th, great let’s discuss them. I have issues with that myself but don’t further the ******** your ilk have been pushing.

 

[utvolpj]

I think if you look at the context, I think a good case could be made that he's not viewing revenge as much as he's decrying the politicization of the confirmation process and the impact it's sure to have on future confirmations.

Hopefully. I just view it as unlikely based on watching him this past week.

 

[hog88]

We all know he did. Spicy food? Farting? Come on, even you know that's true

You know ****, it’s obvious.

 

[utvolpj]

You want to discuss his views on the 4th, great let’s discuss them. I have issues with that myself but don’t further the ******** your ilk have been pushing.

My ilk? That's funny

 

[utvolpj]

You know ****, it’s obvious.

Why do you continue to quote me if my posts are so terrible? Just scroll on past and relax in your echo chamber

 

[hog88]

And so are those claiming this is a victory for the Constitution. Going to call them out too?

Can you point us to your posts objecting to Kegan and Sotomyers confirmation?

 

[NorthDallas40]

And so are those claiming this is a victory for the Constitution. Going to call them out too?

What is unconstitutional in his appointment? While it was a complete crap show the senate voted and he was confirmed. Im not sure I get the reference you’re referring to other than he has a pretty solid record in the bench of applying the law.

 

[hog88]

My ilk? That's funny

Yes your ilk.

 

[volinbham]

I think if you look at the context, I think a good case could be made that he's not vowing revenge as much as he's decrying the hyper-politicization of the confirmation process and the impact it's sure to have on future confirmations.

are you nuts? he was being hyper-partisan; more than any politician ever!

 

[utvolpj]

Can you point us to your posts objecting to Kegan and Sotomyers confirmation?

Freak made a great search function. Use it

 

[hog88]

Why do you continue to quote me if my posts are so terrible? Just scroll on past and relax in your echo chamber

I can’t stand hypocrisy and you are the poster boy for it.

 

[utvolpj]

Yes your ilk.

And what would that be?

 

[utvolpj]

are you nuts? he was being hyper-partisan; more than any politician ever!

Clearly what I said. Congrats dude, your team won. Used to be better than this

 

[volinbham]

And what would that be?

probably have to ask LG and Evillawyer - they use the "i" word more than anyone