I think thats all correct. Except I don't think it will be 'some losses'. It will be alot of losses by big scores. Unless there's some crazy rich quarterback lined up to support the program financiallyObviously, I don't know Kelly Harper but I get the impression that she really loves having a positive impact on her players lives (just like her role model PHS). So, I don't think taking some losses is really a detriment in the grand scheme. I think she may, in fact, thrive on being the underdog coach who can upset the big dogs now and again. She is a great coach for a program that needs to over achieve and she might again have success in the portal to periodically narrow the talent gap. Under Kelly, I think Mizzou who has a dangerous team every three or four years (when a senior group jells).
As I said before, she just wants to die with the whistle on. Actually refreshing to just want to work with and positively influence young people and be willing to lose alot to do it
The down side of her admirable undertaking. Locking in the meh. But if she's willing to do it I have to stop being more bothered by it than she is.A 7 year project? Won’t she give a press conference saying she’s there to win now? She won’t win over fans with those expectations laid out. But glad the board is saying her coaching inabilities out loud now in their own spin now that she’s on someone else’s dime.
And I still think w a few breaks and less bad luck, injury, and bad timing Kellie could have been much more than meh here. That line is so fine.
Last edited: