Judge_Smails
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
- Messages
- 576
- Likes
- 1
Dude, just stop. UK's a good team that will most likely make a good run in this year's tournament.
Glad IU won today though :rock::rock::rock:
Austin Peay has played a much tougher schedule than UK. If you put them on a neutral court Peay would steamroll them by at least 15. At Rupp it's a tossup.
UK is young. If they end up getting a bid to the NCAA tourney I will be surprised. I think losing to unranked Indiana is the start of their downfall this season. They will win between 13-18 games
UK is young. If they end up getting a bid to the NCAA tourney I will be surprised. I think losing to unranked Indiana is the start of their downfall this season. They will win between 13-18 games
Really difficult to say what other games they lose after they lose to a team who hasn't beaten anyone of significance. Whatever the loses are, they will come in away games.
Yes, away games only.
So lets say the lose to BOTH vandy and Fla away. Who else? USC and UGA are awful. UT, no comment here. UL is in Rupp. Besides Bama, the west isnt that great.
I say they'll have 2 losses total going into the NCAA tourny. I think the only time they could lose another is at Vandy or at Fla, but not both. UK is great this year, and just like UNC, one game in December doesnt mean squat. They'll be a #1 seed in March, write it down.
It was a bad idea to let IU easily throw it in to nearly the 3-pt line on the other end, and then basically have everyone retreat. That guaranteed that IU would be able to advance the ball downcourt with time remaining to find a decent shot. Then, when the IU player dribbled across the 3-pt line, four UK players were near the goal. That guaranteed a wide-open look at a 3. With a 2-pt lead on the final play, preventing an open 3 should have been the biggest priority, because that is the only shot that could have beaten them. And, someone else posted in this thread that IU shot 60% from 3 for the game.
If you pause the highlight with two seconds left, and look at where everyone is standing, it looks like IU's plan is to go for the 3 all the way, and UK's plan is to prevent a shot in the paint.
Let's chalk that sequence up to Cal being a lousy in-game coach.
In losses everyone wants to blame the coach, when they win it was because of a players ability. Typical.
UK starts 3 freshmen, its December, its the first road game.