Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

#5,051
#5,051
Weezer said:
KR tried to flee, only to be pursued. In that instance, he had every right to defend himself. He was then attacked by a man swinging a skateboard. Again, every right to defend himself. And finally there was the guy with the gun charging at him. He had the right to defend himself. And a jury agreed that he had that right.

Self-defense is a right. KR made a reasonable attempt to escape the threat before he ever opened fire.
Click to expand...
You have a right to defend yourself but you do not always have the right to respond with deadly force.
 
#5,052
#5,052
1vol8 said:
Ok.... now we’re getting somewhere. You’re uneducated on BLM and that’s ok. Equality is what BLM “started” as and even most of the right respected that. But since, it’s turned into what you seen this past 18 months. It’s become an anti American, domestic terrorist organization. Look at the Rittenhouse case alone and what was happening in that city, THAT’S BLM “now “.
Click to expand...
Sigh I’m as educated as you can be on the premise which is why I defend it so vociferously on this site. No individual, organization, or theory is perfect.
 
#5,054
#5,054
BayVol7 said:
You have a right to defend yourself but you do not always have the right to respond with deadly force.
Click to expand...
Yes you do if you can prove the fear of great bodily harm or imminent death. That’s what you’re not getting. Your feelings don’t change the law and I think that’s where you’re having the disconnect
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#5,055
#5,055
txbo said:
No he was a scared boy that acted liked a grown man. He stopped the two violent felons from murdering him and most likely others. Also kept little boys from being raped and women from being beaten.
#ThankYouKyle
Click to expand...
I’m sorry but threats and lunging do not equal murder. Nor does one swing of a skateboard.
 
#5,059
#5,059
BayVol7 said:
Sigh I’m as educated as you can be on the premise which is why I defend it so vociferously on this site. No individual, organization, or theory is perfect.
Click to expand...
You just said you are not a part of a BLM organization. Which means you’re either ignoring what they’re all about or you agree with it. If you’re ignoring, you’re uneducated and misinformed. If you agree with it then you’re just as guilty as they are and I find it ridiculous that anyone could back an organization that is literally killing innocent people in the street
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#5,060
#5,060
1vol8 said:
Yes you do if you can prove the fear of great bodily harm or imminent death. That’s what you’re not getting. Your feelings don’t change the law and I think that’s where you’re having the disconnect
Click to expand...
I was specifically responding to txbo saying two individuals were going to murder the kid.
I’ve said over and over again that WI SD requirement has a lower threshold than most states. I even quoted the regulation. To be clear, out of the three incidents, I don’t believe the 2nd murder was justified under WI SD.
 
#5,061
#5,061
1vol8 said:
You just said you are not a part of a BLM organization. Which means you’re either ignoring what they’re all about or you agree with it. If you’re ignoring, you’re uneducated and misinformed. If you agree with it then you’re just as guilty as they are and I find it ridiculous that anyone could back an organization that is literally killing innocent people in the street
Click to expand...
Do you agree with everything people on the right and/or republicans do?
 
#5,062
#5,062
BayVol7 said:
I was specifically responding to txbo saying two individuals were going to murder the kid.
I’ve said over and over again that WI SD requirement has a lower threshold than most states. I even quoted the regulation. To be clear, out of the three incidents, I don’t believe the 2nd murder was justified under WI SD.
Click to expand...
Key phrase- “I don’t believe”. If it wasn’t, the prosecution would’ve exploited it
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, Rickyvol77 and StarRaider
#5,064
#5,064
BayVol7 said:
I was specifically responding to txbo saying two individuals were going to murder the kid.
I’ve said over and over again that WI SD requirement has a lower threshold than most states. I even quoted the regulation. To be clear, out of the three incidents, I don’t believe the 2nd murder was justified under WI SD.
Click to expand...
The Jury disagrees. /thread
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO, marcusluvsvols and SpaceCoastVol
#5,067
#5,067
BayVol7 said:
You have a right to defend yourself but you do not always have the right to respond with deadly force.
Click to expand...
But a jury decided in this case that deadly force was a reasonable response. After all, as previously mentioned, KR attempted to flee. This idea that carrying a gun is inviting trouble is absurd. KR had as much right as the protesters to be there. He was attacked, and only resorted to deadly force when he felt he had no other option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and StarRaider
#5,068
#5,068
BayVol7 said:
I’d say the same thing regardless of the situation. The two people who were murdered did not have weapons. He shot at the 1st person 4 times. If someone brandishes a gun of that caliber to a rally, they should be charged with more self restraint. Should the kid have received a murder charge? Maybe not, but there should have been some penalty for his actions.
Click to expand...

Please say the phrase, “one one thousand” out loud and then think about the fact that those 4 shots happened in less time than it took you to count that full second of time, around 75% less actually.

As to caliber what kind of damage do you think a .40 caliber round from a handgun at pretty much point blank range would have done to Kyle’s head?

By the way, Kyle didn’t brandish that rifle. Maybe go learn some accurate gun terminology and get back to us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, StarRaider and 1vol8
#5,069
#5,069
BayVol7 said:
Why can’t that be the same for me? People on the right have done absolutely terrible things.
Click to expand...
Name something remotely close to leaving Americans behind enemy lines, looting, killing, wanting access to your bank account, arming an enemy, opening our boarders to cartels and strategical placing sleeper cells all around the US. All while trying to disarm us. I’ll wait
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol and marcusluvsvols
#5,070
#5,070
BayVol7 said:
I’d say the same thing regardless of the situation. The two people who were murdered did not have weapons. He shot at the 1st person 4 times. If someone brandishes a gun of that caliber to a rally, they should be charged with more self restraint. Should the kid have received a murder charge? Maybe not, but there should have been some penalty for his actions.
Click to expand...
Another slander of the accused/acquitted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#5,072
#5,072
1vol8 said:
Name something remotely close to leaving Americans behind enemy lines, looting, killing, wanting access to your bank account, arming an enemy, opening our boarders to cartels and strategical placing sleeper cells all around the US. All while trying to disarm us.
Click to expand...
Kill innocent people immediately after saying a closing prayer in church.
 
#5,073
#5,073
I bet the guy that just finished telling him that he was going to cut his heart out if he caught him alone was just going to give hugs and kisses once he caught up to him. Even tried the element of surprise for more thrill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and DynaLo
#5,074
#5,074
BayVol7 said:
I’m sorry but threats and lunging do not equal murder. Nor does one swing of a skateboard.
Click to expand...

It literally does in every state in this country if you believe that person is going to do great bodily harm to you or kill you , not only that you have the right to defend others from the same .
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, DynaLo and 1vol8
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top