BayVol7
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,669
- Likes
- 126
Um, this is not how it works. Self defense is not a charge against the other party. It is a legal defense weighed accordingly to each charge presented.Do you understand that the jury agreeing with self defense on the higher charges automatically erased the lesser charges.
If he’d have somehow been originally given lesser charges the jury would have still acquitted on self defense grounds based on the evidence they saw.
It’s either self defense or it’s not, there is no well maybe involved.
Yea you are stupid. As a Republican I mean that. Or the Don is the biggest Cuck in POTUS history. So you tell me which.That riot took place because the “process” was not followed. Like it or not Biden is not the president because he was not elected by us. That was Trump. Biden was put in place by the left.
I was specifically responding to txbo saying two individuals were going to murder the kid.
I’ve said over and over again that WI SD requirement has a lower threshold than most states. I even quoted the regulation. To be clear, out of the three incidents, I don’t believe the 2nd murder was justified under WI SD.
Partially correct here IMO. He is free because of what he was ultimately charged with and the framing of case by the judge.Your apathetic approach to how self defense law is defined is not serving you well. Let's try another approach to vet KT's justification for self defense.
Sometimes the approaches taken by opposing counsel can tell you a great deal. If the defense has a really bad case you can get all manner of Hail Mary attempts. Prosecutors with poor cases... well if you followed the Rittenhouse trial (as in actually followed, not just sampled curated bits pushed out through media) you'd have seen an ADA doing his best to polish a turd. Meanwhile the defense was mostly "Here's testimony, here's pics and here's video justifying a verdict for self defense in accordance with the law." That's why KR is free.
I (not WI law) don’t think one shot was warranted in the 1st murder. The last victim who last an arm is the hardest instance to argue differently given the facts that have come to light.
Pretty sure I said he had an AR-15 but I’m definitely not a gun expert.
Q? Don’t know why his past is held against him in this instance. He also had a diagnosed mental illness.
Um, this is not how it works. Self defense is not a charge against the other party. It is a legal defense weighed accordingly to each charge presented.
Partially correct here IMO. He is free because of what he was ultimately charged with and the framing of case by the judge.
You think the two people he murdered were on the verge of killing him? If so, we have a different understanding of the facts.