While I've heard a lot about how young this team is, I haven't heard anybody mention whether its the youngest, one of the youngest, etc. in Pat's term.
While I'm not going to be ignorant enough to question her ability- like some folks are Pearl for the men merely barely exceeding their ability- I do wonder about the fact that I don't remember CPS having a team with so few developed leaders & older players.
Does anybody know how we got in this position?
A few weeks ago, I wondered if Pat's success at promoting the overall game of women's hoops didn't have a role in her job at UT getting harder, but surely that wouldn't explain having such an extreme case of "rebuilding year"....