Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

Snopes is a joke because they have been wrong before too and purveyors of "fake news". Everyone has an agenda so people should look everywhere for confirmation and make up their own minds
And as a society we are much worse at legitimately doing that than we were 4 years ago. Gaslighting....Thanks Trump.......MAGA
 
I agree. I believe our response has crippled us for further outbreaks, or really anything that pops up.

I still believe the economic impact will be far worse than loss of life. And I dont mean 401ks

I'd like to think that competent leadership would learn from the mistakes that were made and reinforce what was done right. If this was a 'test run' as some believe it to be, then we've been given a sneak peek at the final exam.
 
The judge's restraining order was requested by the city because she refused to close down her business. Her business was deemed by the government as non-essential. This is un-constitutional.

This kind of total BS has to stop.

Be that as it may, if a judge tells you not to do something or you'll go to jail and then you willfully do that thing. Don't be surprised or mad when you get thrown in the pokey.
 
I'd like to think that competent leadership would learn from the mistakes that were made and reinforce what was done right. If this was a 'test run' as some believe it to be, then we've been given a sneak peek at the final exam.
I've had midterms that were nowhere like the final.

Of course that was a law exam, so that explains it.

Lawyers. . .
 
The doctors from France and California??? Are their testimonies and provided data not compelling enough?
I have read some of them and they are not coming from organizations that conduct medical clinical trials. The data seems to be coming from doctors who have treated maybe a few patients and not enough in a controlled environment to be considered a valid study. Dr Oz is one of them. I'm not sure he has even treated one patient.

Doctors group claims that hydroxychloroquine helps 91% of coronavirus patients | Daily Mail Online
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
Can you provide examples? Snopes does a good job of policing themselves as well as being able to substantiate what it posts.
Hilaries campaign as the source of the obama passport nonsense was one.

I forget the exact years but they listed a 2011(?) date as the start of the questions, and how that date wasnt linked to Hilary despite listing a 2010(?) date from Hilarys campaign.

Did Clinton Supporters Start the 'Birther' Movement?

Here's the article. They blame a conservative website in 2008 after mentioning hilaries campaign posting an email in 2007.

A couple other earlier dates mentioned to, so it's weird they skipped to 2008. But it seems agenda driven to push attention away from hilary and towards conversatives during the 2016 election season despite providing evidence counter to the false assumption.

There were a couple snopes articles posted on VN with similar inconsistencies. I only read them after they get brought up enough times.

I dont read enough of them to say its indictive, but I definitely dont believe anything more or less depending on the snopes rating
 
I'd like to think that competent leadership would learn from the mistakes that were made and reinforce what was done right. If this was a 'test run' as some believe it to be, then we've been given a sneak peek at the final exam.
I would agree on the good leadership part, but I dont know why anyone would look to DC for it. They are all too busy playing politics.

Biden is up there saying we need to focus on the pandemic and ignore the politics while silently standing by his wife as she rants on Trump. Trump just makes everything about him. And then you have all the responses from March from all the Dems who said Trump was wrong to shut things down.

Politics, politics everywhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad and 37L1
Hilaries campaign as the source of the obama passport nonsense was one.

I forget the exact years but they listed a 2011(?) date as the start of the questions, and how that date wasnt linked to Hilary despite listing a 2010(?) date from Hilarys campaign.

Did Clinton Supporters Start the 'Birther' Movement?

Here's the article. They blame a conservative website in 2008 after mentioning hilaries campaign posting an email in 2007.

A couple other earlier dates mentioned to, so it's weird they skipped to 2008. But it seems agenda driven to push attention away from hilary and towards conversatives during the 2016 election season despite providing evidence counter to the false assumption.

There were a couple snopes articles posted on VN with similar inconsistencies. I only read them after they get brought up enough times.

I dont read enough of them to say its indictive, but I definitely dont believe anything more or less depending on the snopes rating

What about this birthirism issue are you suggesting snopes got wrong?
 
The judge's restraining order was requested by the city because she refused to close down her business. Her business was deemed by the government as non-essential. This is un-constitutional.

This kind of total BS has to stop.

Hopefully things like this will convince people to really look into candidates for local and state offices before they cast a vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt2496
I'd like to think that competent leadership would learn from the mistakes that were made and reinforce what was done right. If this was a 'test run' as some believe it to be, then we've been given a sneak peek at the final exam.

LOL

A politicians first thought is "what will this do to my reelection chances".
 
Be that as it may, if a judge tells you not to do something or you'll go to jail and then you willfully do that thing. Don't be surprised or mad when you get thrown in the pokey.
Maybe not surprised..... but you can definitely be mad about them taking away our rights and how willing some of our fellow citizens are willing to give theirs up.
 
Be that as it may, if a judge tells you not to do something or you'll go to jail and then you willfully do that thing. Don't be surprised or mad when you get thrown in the pokey.
The restraining order should not have been issued to begin with.
 
Sure it is; when you state I'm misleading or misled, I challenge you to be specific, then rebut your argument. You're invited to state your case. If you need help, start with Carter Page.

it doesn't matter whether Trump and Amash were on opposite sides of his amendment. What does that have to do with his utter disregard for those agencies corruption, their launching baseless investigations into a campaign, president, entrapping and ruining 37 year veterans (Flynn), a known CIA asset/veteran/and FBI asset (Page), and run a rope a dope with foreign agents on Pappa? Are you saying Amash is that petty and vindictive, to let Trump staff hang over a policy disagreement with Trump?! Wooo...that's even worse than I stated it.

Further, it has nothing to do with Amash's support for impeachment, over three separate issues, from May 2017 (Comey firing), May 2019 (Mueller report), and Sept 2019 (Ukraine call).

It appears Amash has an impeach reflex re: Trump. TDS-Lite, perhaps.
Whatever the case, he looks good in the stall but don't run him on the track.

“Man who doesn’t care about actual problems with FISA thinks Justin Amash should do more about fake FISA abuse narrative.”

That doesn’t even move the needle enough to go look for another gif.
 
Last edited:
Hopefully things like this will convince people to really look into candidates for local and state offices before they cast a vote.
Bahahahaha.

Although this is what I believe the FF meant when they said an educated population.

Government funded schooling was not wide spread.
 
What flip flop ? Fauci and his 15?minutes of fame are over and it keeps whiny ass democrats from complaining.The virus is waning and it’s on to the next crisis!
Do you not remember Pence saying the Task Force was shutting down? This happened yesterday.
 

VN Store



Back
Top