Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#52,676
#52,676
lawgator1 said:
Nice try to dodge it. It will not be simply the existence of more cases or the existence of more deaths. It will be the rate. That has been leveling off or even falling for awhile.

That trend reverses and the rate of both go up? Hasta la vista Trump, for sure.
Click to expand...

Same song you have been singing the last 4 years and have been wrong every time but hey keep wishing for more death counts. It suits you well
 
#52,677
#52,677
vols40 said:
Same song you have been singing the last 4 years and have been wrong every time but hey keep wishing for more death counts. It suits you well
Click to expand...


Ah yes, the most famous and imbecilic of the Trump slurper lines of illogic:

1) You hate Trump.

2) You adhere to science and reason. Science and reason say that Trump's actions (or inactions) will cause greater spread of the virus.

3. Therefore, you want people to catch the virus and die.

tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman, Purple Tiger and titansvolsfaninga
#52,678
#52,678
lawgator1 said:
Ah yes, the most famous and imbecilic of the Trump slurper lines of illogic:

1) You hate Trump.

2) You adhere to science and reason. Science and reason say that Trump's actions (or inactions) will cause greater spread of the virus.

3. Therefore, you want people to catch the virus and die.

tenor.gif
Click to expand...

That describes you in all 3 points
 
#52,681
#52,681
LouderVol said:
Amash is looking at the big picture. You want to punish the single instance but do nothing to fix the problem at large.

Amash is going after the root problem instead of playing party politics.

You are upset it was used against Trump, and dont care that Trump has supported/used the same tool. Amash wants to remove it for everyone so that no one can use it going forward.
Click to expand...

You have no basis for the comments I bolded. You may retract or support it.

I'm "upset" it was used at all, in the manner used. Good grief that I have to explain that. I'm on record in this forum saying that Trump is incidental, the dangers to our liberty are not Trump losing the election (though it may well be, given the opposition) but in not hanging these people from the gates of 1600 Pennylvania Ave. Is that clear enough?

Amash is looking through the lens of Trump, and his vocal and lengthy, detailed diatribes on why he should be impeached for three different offenses. He has time for a 20-tweet storm to impeach Trump following Mueller report, but not can't find the time to actually make a statement regarding good Americans like Page, Flynn, etc.?

You get the same question I asked RT85: Say, how can Amash defend Comey, pillory FISA, and cling to the "flunky Barr and impeach guilty Trump" narrative? Especially when Barr and Durham are the most important people in America right now regarding the problem - ?

Those things don't co-exist. Amash lacks the courage of his convictions at the most opportune moment. When he can find the time, admit he was wrong, and retracts his characterization of Barr, I'll give him credit. Til then, show pony.
 
Last edited:
#52,682
#52,682
TennTradition said:
Well - what I meant by micro was just that the micro in the less-affected areas would be better off. Micro still suffers mightily in the urban areas in that scenario, and that drives macro, which then pushes back on micro everywhere.

I don't disagree with your analysis of what's happening with micro/macro now.
Click to expand...
I think it's just as criminal that the government has willfully don nothing about the economics, as I would have if they had done nothing about the medical.

I dont blame the deep state, I blame the way our politicians work in regards to under reactions following over reactions, and vise versa.
 
#52,686
#52,686
NCFisher said:
You have no basis for the comments I bolded. You may retract or support it.

I'm "upset" it was used at all, in the manner used. Good grief that I have to explain that. I'm on record in this forum saying that Trump is incidental, the dangers to our liberty are not Trump losing the election (though it may well be, given the opposition) but in not hanging these people from the gates of 1600 Pennylvania Ave. Is that clear enough?

Amash is looking through the lens of Trump, and his vocal and lengthy, detailed diatribes on why he should be impeached for three different offenses. He has time for a 20-tweet storm to impeach Trump following Mueller report, but not can't find the time to actually make a statement regarding good Americans like Page, Flynn, etc.?

You get the same question I asked RT85: Say, how can Amash defend Comey, pillory FISA, and cling to the "flunky Barr and impeach guilty Trump" narrative? Especially when Barr and Durham are the most important people in America right now regarding the problem - ?

Those things don't co-exist. Amash lacks the courage of his convictions at the most opportune moment. When he can find the time, admit he was wrong, and retracts his characterization of Barr, I'll give him credit. Til then, show pony.
Click to expand...
I guess I am confused as to how you dont see his 20 tweets as his reasoning for voting to impeach Trump. You are complaining about how he takes the time to tweet about the impeachment, but then you also cant understand how he backs the "flunky Barr and impeach guilty Trump". He explains it in the tweets.

Him railing against FISA in general would include the specifics of Trumos cases wouldnt it?

I guess I am getting the distinction you are trying to make here.

I asked before and havent seen a response why would Amash comment on the particulars of Page and Flynn? Is he supposed to come out on every abuse of power? He commented on Trump because he is a voting member of the impeachment. I dont think he has that role in either of the Page or Flynn cases. If I am wrong please show me.

I dont consider it questionable for Amash to treat different cases, with different levels of his personal involvement, differently.
 
#52,692
#52,692
azVolFan said:
Everyone not at risk should out, living their lives. Those at risk can stay home if they want. "Their bodies, their lives".

30 million people are unemployed. The repercussions could last for years. Yeah yeah... Orange man bad. Whatever it takes, right?
Click to expand...

Selfishness and naivety abound.
 
#52,697
#52,697
Tennesseefan2019 said:
You say that type of thing about most videos that you disagree with politically. I think he should be fired by President Trump for his Wuhan lab connections and the face that he's a Grade A backstabber!
Click to expand...
Lol... Not sure what you think my politics are. That video would be awful whether I was Libertarian or Communist.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top