The bakery took the case to the Supreme Court after the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the body which enforces the state's anti-discrimination law, the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, found that the bakery had discriminated against the couple.
The bakery believed that their Constitutional rights were impinged upon, unlike in say diners not serving African--Americans in the 1960s where no such claims could be made, and they won that case 7-2.
As they should have.
In the real world, people with differences can use state and federal courts to get a just and abiding decision.
Now you can tell what this all means in the partisan realms of conspiracy and evil actors bent on destroying all that is good in the world.
In the past media is not so vigilant about rights of the private business owners. I know in my local media this is true and the statement I heard today runs completely contrary to how they have reported similar situations in the past.
She was stating this news as if she was all of a sudden the presidential candidate for the libertarian party. I've heard this dimwit for years and it isnt consistent whatsoever with her past.
Part of the reason the bakers above get dragged thru the court system is because the reporting typically insists they are incorrect in their beliefs and creates support for the ones bringing the legal action.