Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#86,978
#86,978
AshG said:
No, because their eating of gluten products won't kill me.

If I had a nut allergy so severe that airborne particulate could send me into anaphylaxis, I would ask if nut products were going to be served. If they really want me there, they'll make the decision to not serve my products. Otherwise, I have to stay home.
Click to expand...
That’s fair. But going out in public is different than going to see family or friends too.
 
#86,979
#86,979
OHvol40 said:
Dismissed Russian interference in our election, proclaimed that he trusted Vladimir Putin over American intelligence, was by far the most nepotistic modern president, nixed the Paris climate accord without plans or replacements of any kind, employed criminal scum to run his campaign (as is now proven by their collective criminal records), appointed to most incompetent cabinet in recent history, had a revolving door of appointees, tried to use his office (and our tax dollars) to influence a foreign country to bring down a political rival, was subsequently impeached, hid his taxes/finances, tried to buy Greenland, sharpied a hurricane forecast model, ostracized basically all Mexicans and Muslims, blatantly disrespected vets like John McCain, claimed vaccines cause autism, claimed Obama was Muslim, foreign, spying on him, Charles Manson reincarnate (probably), revealed classified info to Russian ambassador, refused to support PR after two major hurricanes, cut corporate taxes waaay too much, flirted with white nationalist (a lot), shut the government down over a dumb azz wall, separated migrant children from their parents, sprayed protestors with tear gas for a photo op, oh and he was documented as the most blatant liar in modern history.

What a precedent to set for the highest office in the country.
Click to expand...
I guess he fixed all that Russian election interference huh? You watch way too much CNN. Half of that are flat out lies and the other half literally have zero impact on anything but feelings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#86,985
#86,985
TNVOLNAVY said:
More evidence masks are total horse crap.

So far, most studies found little to no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth face masks in the general population, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.

Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence.
Click to expand...
They make liberals feel better, like they are actually doing something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#86,992
#86,992
titansvolsfaninga said:
They actually went on a full lock down in Wuhan for about 2 months. We can't even get people to consistently wear or masks. There is NO national response. You have 50 different states doing 50 different things. Then you have cities within each state doing different things. You ask people to not do something, and they refuse to do things because of being a sheep and freedom.
Click to expand...
You must not have seen the videos from China where they had cars going through roadblocks .... putting nooses around people’s necks and dousing them with disinfectant...... but sheep and socialists and commies love that kind of domination
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol and TNVOLNAVY
#86,994
#86,994
TNVOLNAVY said:
More evidence masks are total horse crap.

So far, most studies found little to no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth face masks in the general population, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.

Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence.
Click to expand...

That's a really poorly done meta analysis. A decent site worth its bandwidth would have included studies that contradict their chosen source material and explained the differences in study outcomes as well as why they chose each of the representative studies.

That site smacks of confirmation bias.
 
#86,996
#86,996
AshG said:
That's a really poorly done meta analysis. A decent site worth its bandwidth would have included studies that contradict their chosen source material and explained the differences in study outcomes as well as why they chose each of the representative studies.

That site smacks of confirmation bias.
Click to expand...

Why is it a poor meta analysis? I would like to see clinical studies on the effectiveness of masks. Basic science/laboratory research has shown effectiveness of masks. But unfortunately, most clinical research does not confirm those findings in real life.

I could certainly be mistaken. So please show me any clinical data from some study that should’ve been included in the meta analysis that would show/prove effectiveness of masks in actual real world data.

And...I’m not an anti masker. I wear one religiously. But I do believe there’s a disconnect between the laboratory/basic science of wearing a mask and the real world/clinical application of mask wearing.
 
#86,997
#86,997
AshG said:
That's a really poorly done meta analysis. A decent site worth its bandwidth would have included studies that contradict their chosen source material and explained the differences in study outcomes as well as why they chose each of the representative studies.

That site smacks of confirmation bias.
Click to expand...

Because it doesn’t support what you want to believe?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top