Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,845
Point 1: You're kinda right, but mostly wrong. They don't fully protect against COVID, they're about 90% effective at preventing COVID which was disclosed when they were released. Pretty damn good effective rate.These particular "vaccines" are brand new and have 8 months of track record. They don't prevent C-19, but they do appear to slightly improve symptoms. But as I've shown on many occasions, not enough of a statistical difference to push people over to get vaccinated.
Why is it of your concern?Point 1: You're kinda right, but mostly wrong. They don't fully protect against COVID, they're about 90% effective at preventing COVID which was disclosed when they were released. Pretty damn good effective rate.
Point 2: I realize this is the case for a lot of people. Unfortunately, they will either have to either suffer themselves (and hopefully not die) or watch their loved ones suffer or die to be convinced. That's the sad state of where a lot of people are.
Ya the only right that might come into play is privacy, but there's so much precedent for requiring proof of vaccination status that it'd be hard to make the case for that. Heck I couldn't go to UT if I hadn't proven I had a whole host of vaccines, and I couldn't have gotten a job without proving I wasn't doing drugs. It would take some kind of lawyer to convince a judge/jury that the covid vaccine is radically different from those scenarios. I don't like it, but I do think companies have the right to do it.
Point 1: You're kinda right, but mostly wrong. They don't fully protect against COVID, they're about 90% effective at preventing COVID which was disclosed when they were released. Pretty damn good effective rate.
So what do you think about that? Do you think this was a death/hospitalization that could have easily been prevented?
This media-driven assault on Ivermectin as a "horse dewormer" is literally the most ignorant thing I've seen all year. Almost every medication used in veterinary medicine is also used in humans or is derived from a similar human drug. Hell, I've even prescribed ivermectin several times.
Are we talking about the Delta variant specifically or the entire COVID umbrella?Absolutely not the case, now. Due to multiple mutations in the spike protein, protection is nowhere close to 90% vs the Delta variant.
That, along with ignoring any other therapeutics that may be available and ignoring/downplaying natural immunity gives it the appearance that this is agenda driven.FDA is like do not use this medication that has been in use for 20 plus years, but do use this vaccine that is less than 1 year old.
Makes total sense.
I'm not shy about saying that I think that everyone who can get vaccinated should do so. I've now personally known four people that died of Covid and none were vaccinated, though the first three didn't have the opportunity. Would any of the four be alive if they'd been vaxxed, and would my 38-year-old classmate be in something other than absolutely awful shape? I don't know. It would feel like piling on to act as if I could be certain. I just know that I'll go get a booster the day it becomes available to me.
I do not have any family or friends that have gotten really sick from C19 but I have a slew who have died of smoking related causes and a few that have died of alcoholism. All fall under the category of preventable deaths but getting a vaccine is infinitely easier than quitting alcohol or smoking. I don't think you're going out on a limb to think that your co-worker would still be alive if vaxxed
Now we’re talking!
View attachment 389068
This dumbass can’t do a damn thing rightBiden about to destroy the India-US relationship is record time as well.
India in the eye of the Taliban (msn.com)