lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,213
- Likes
- 42,653
Rather than break down all the examples of anti-science against the lab leak theory proponents I'll post this article which has plenty of good examples.
My favorite is the NYT science and health reporter clinging to the lab leak theory as being not only a conspiracy but racist even after Fauci came around and said it was plausible.
COVID lab leak is a scandal of media and government censorship
Politifact labeled a scientist's claim that it was man-made as a "pants on fire" lie (they later retracted the assessment).
it was the lab leak deniers that were anti-science
You don’t think the US Department of Energy, in it’s operation of 17 Science & Technology laboratories, ever deals with lab security?The list they have there is kind of what I expected but none jumps out at me as appropo to this. Maybe I missed it.
Anthony Fauci himself, with the entire CDC leadership team, could come out and say this was all a farce.Russian Collusion
Trump is a Russian agent
COVID
Hunters laptop
NSA isn't spying on you..
Lies and lies..and when the facts come out 2 years later..It is like they dont matter. Now that is someone who has been programmed.
Anthony Fauci himself, with the entire CDC leadership team, could come out and say this was all a farce.
Do you really think that would matter to an LG or EL?
Would you agree that right now we have at least one agency saying, with low confidence, that a lab accidentally released it, and at least some other agencies, saying with low or at best medium confidence, that it was a natural mutation?
If so, I hardly see why all the conspiracy theorizing and gloating from the usual suspects, though of course you have not needed a reason before.
It wasn't anti-science. The lab leak theory is as based in science as is the natural theory.
Neither was proven via science.
Natural theory = entirely based on past history that this is a way the viruses move from animal to human. The science against it was and continues to be the lack of the transmission chain. That alone suggests the theory may be wrong.
Lab leak = has happened before in China, lab working on these types of viruses, virus emerged at the location where the work was going on, cleavage site on virus appeared unnatural.
Each is based on pieces of evidence and neither is conclusive.
To say the lab leak theory was anti-science at the beginning is simply untrue. Dismissing it out of hand is anti-science.
Would you agree that right now we have at least one agency saying, with low confidence, that a lab accidentally released it, and at least some other agencies, saying with low or at best medium confidence, that it was a natural mutation?
If so, I hardly see why all the conspiracy theorizing and gloating from the usual suspects, though of course you have not needed a reason before.
Do you believe the DOE & FBI will be the last to change their position?Would you agree that right now we have at least one agency saying, with low confidence, that a lab accidentally released it, and at least some other agencies, saying with low or at best medium confidence, that it was a natural mutation?
If so, I hardly see why all the conspiracy theorizing and gloating from the usual suspects, though of course you have not needed a reason before.
Some people just need the government to tell them the truth. When in fact as pointed out in just my concise summary without any thought whatsoever..they lie all the time. Sheeple.
Not my fault for being a antagonist for everything they say. They are liars.
Look at Iraqi War..the Dems were all in with their WMD claims and supported the war..no WMD's and they were like the IC, Bush, Cheney..devils. Now they lick gov nuts.