Actually quit smoking last yearLike my ole buddy always says..View attachment 245901
They could be the same reasoning. But I support People not being able to drive drunk or be overly intoxicated from beer or open containers too. I support making weed just like beerAnd I was pointing out the same reasoning you gave could (and has) be used to support the criminalization of the possession, manufacture, and distribution of.... alcohol.
Are the dots starting to connect for you?
They could be the same reasoning. But I support People not being able to drive drunk or be overly intoxicated from beer or open containers too. I support making weed just like beer
How do you think most arrests for weed happen? I’ve been in L.E. 20 yrs and I have never ever arrested or cited someone for a joint in their house. It’s because they are high driving. Or have a blunt in their car while also stealing things or have an illegal gun. Or a bag of weed along with bags of heroin and pills and meth. It’s not the fact that they “have a joint” that’s the issue. Alcohol isn’t allowed to be in cars in open containers eitherDrunk driving and driving while high is already illegal, but alcohol is totally legal. So again, what's the difference here?
And just weed? You think MDMA causes more societal harm than alcohol? I thought you weren't for banning anything?
How do you think most arrests for weed happen? I’ve been in L.E. 20 yrs and I have never ever arrested or cited someone for a joint in their house. It’s because they are high driving. Or have a blunt in their car while also stealing things or have an illegal gun. Or a bag of weed along with bags of heroin and pills and meth. It’s not the fact that they “have a joint” that’s the issue. Alcohol isn’t allowed to be in cars in open containers either
once they have served their time punishment, shouldn't they be free of stigma and any handicaps? if not seems like you are punishing them beyond the scope of the law/justice. That felon/law thing goes both ways. if they serve their time and punishment they should be free and clear. just like if you obey they laws you shouldn't be bothered. but we all know that neither of those actually happen.stigma because they CHOSE to be felons....no one made them kill someone, rape someone, steal, deal drugs, causing an accident because they were high/drunk...
There is a reason that people don't hire or like felons, and it's not because of "stigma", its because they are very likely to commit further criminal acts....
The moral of the story is don't be a felon
My point was that alcohol though legal is still illegal in several different ways. How you transport it, how it’s made, how you use it. Weed being legal (which is fine w me) doesn’t change anything with how people are arrested for it other than being able to use it at homeWhat do you think my point is? Are we having the same conversation?
You: this is why x is illegal
Me: y is legal even though it is just as or more harmful than x, so why is x banned
You: you can't drive under the influence of y
How does that follow?
evidence is not confiscation at all. either that or cops have been profiting from evidence for a LONG time, and anyone should see that as wrong.but you are talking about conviction, not the arrest...the confiscation happens at the arrest, not necessarily after the conviction...
law enforcement holds a lot of items as evidence depending on the case, you are saying this shouldn't be
but you are saying it’s wrong for people to want to know that someone they hire or marry or live with or whatever used to be in prison. I think it is wise and sensible to know that. Not to “harass or abuse” the person following their release but to be aware for obvious reasonsonce they have served their time punishment, shouldn't they be free of stigma and any handicaps? if not seems like you are punishing them beyond the scope of the law/justice. That felon/law thing goes both ways. if they serve their time and punishment they should be free and clear. just like if you obey they laws you shouldn't be bothered. but we all know that neither of those actually happen.
but it would provide an alternative.yes it would...people who didnt want to be licensed or didnt want to owe money to a brothel owner, or simply wanted to do it would do it on the street, legal or not