I feel the same way. It's all about exercising some class. Talking about how much you give is no different than talking about how much you have. They are both traits of the nouveau riche', which as a group don't always exhibit classy behavoir. I would much rather see someone be inconspicuous as far as charity is concerned.
I believe the point is that the liberal line is that they care more about the poor and conservatives hate the poor. It's obviously an untruth. This is some data showing that conservatives are quite generous when it comes to helping those less fortunate.
Ultimately, the ideological difference is in the method of helping the less fortunate not that one group "cares" more or less.
Not a thing. But the discussion was about Liberals being less giving.
The majority of the donations, I would be willing to bet, constitue church tithes as opposed to direct community center/shelter donations. From my seats tithes go to who can build the biggest church and pay their pastor the most. The note that Bush, who wore his faith on his sleeve and wouldn't have got elected with pandering to the Jesus crowd happened to win in states where giveing was highest (ie, churchgoers) doesn't surprise me one bit.
Nice try.
I believe the point is that the liberal line is that they care more about the poor and conservatives hate the poor. It's obviously an untruth. This is some data showing that conservatives are quite generous when it comes to helping those less fortunate.
Ultimately, the ideological difference is in the method of helping the less fortunate not that one group "cares" more or less.
I believe the point is that the liberal line is that they care more about the poor and conservatives hate the poor. It's obviously an untruth. This is some data showing that conservatives are quite generous when it comes to helping those less fortunate.
Ultimately, the ideological difference is in the method of helping the less fortunate not that one group "cares" more or less.
Nice generalization made their without any data, from your "seats" no doubt.
Standard Operating Procedure for the politics forum.
I probably pass 8 massive, mega churches on my daily errand runs, half of which are in perpetual expansion with contruction and add-ons. So, from my seats, yes...I wonder what % of tithes go to charity, and what % go to a pissing contest on who can build the biggest church on the block.
I suspect many a camel with pass through the eye of a needle come judgement day.
I believe the point is that the liberal line is that they care more about the poor and conservatives hate the poor. It's obviously an untruth. This is some data showing that conservatives are quite generous when it comes to helping those less fortunate.
Ultimately, the ideological difference is in the method of helping the less fortunate not that one group "cares" more or less.
The point of the OP is liberals are greedy, which is obviously an untruth.
Standard Operating Procedure for the politics forum.
I probably pass 8 massive, mega churches on my daily errand runs, half of which are in perpetual expansion with contruction and add-ons. So, from my seats, yes...I wonder what % of tithes go to charity, and what % go to a pissing contest on who can build the biggest church on the block.
I suspect many a camel will pass through the eye of a needle come judgement day.
I probably pass 8 massive, mega churches on my daily errand runs, half of which are in perpetual expansion with contruction and add-ons. So, from my seats, yes...I wonder what % of tithes go to charity, and what % go to a pissing contest on who can build the biggest church on the block.
.
That's odd. I remember a fairly recent thread where argued this ad nauseum.
Right. This is why the free market is the solution. Would you rather deal with business owners who satisfy their greed by providing the economy with products and services that we want to voluntarily purchase, or politicians and bureaucrats who satisfy their greed at the expense of the taxpayer, by force? There's nothing charitable about taking from one and giving to another. Socialists aren't very charitable with their own money. That should tell you something.