McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 56,837
- Likes
- 119,316
I mean I guess if that is the narrative lol.It sort of is?
2001 Furman (he was the QB) lost their first game of the year.
And 2015 Alabama (he was the WR coach) lost in September.
But 2011 Alabama (he was an analyst for the team) didn’t lose until November, however.
Nope, you BVS sufferers don’t get to do this. If they were changing qbs right before our game you could. But no. There will be plenty of tape on the kid by the time they come to Knoxville.great, we will be the team that he figures it all out against and has a Heisman-esque performance before disappearing.
Lol. I just don’t get fretting over it. Will being all gloom and doom about it now really make you any less upset if we lose somehow? Like we lose to this abysmal Florida team and you’re going to be like, “No big, I expected this, everything’s hunky dory”? I can’t imagine that’s the case. If we win big, all this negativity and pearl clutching just makes you look silly. If we win close, maybe it’s a wash. If we manage to lose, you’re still going to be upset, but instead of only being upset after the game, you made yourself miserable before too. What possible benefit do you and the rest of the Florida Jinx crowd gain from continuing to peddle this narrative?then maybe the now starter struggles, and they have to put Mertz back in after getting zero practice time over the coming weeks, and they beat us.
a nice streak of wins, 5 or 6 games, or if we lose a couple and its not to some flukey bs.What's your metreic (wins, streak of wins, balance of series, etc) and where does it need to be before you put the "Florida fealty" behind you?
I have always been a "hope for the best, prepare for the worst" crowd. the Florida game has been in the "worst" category for most of my fandom going back to '07.Lol. I just don’t get fretting over it. Will being all gloom and doom about it now really make you any less upset if we lose somehow? Like we lose to this abysmal Florida team and you’re going to be like, “No big, I expected this, everything’s hunky dory”? I can’t imagine that’s the case. If we win big, all this negativity and pearl clutching just makes you look silly. If we win close, maybe it’s a wash. If we manage to lose, you’re still going to be upset, but instead of only being upset after the game, you made yourself miserable before too. What possible benefit do you and the rest of the Florida Jinx crowd gain from continuing to peddle this narrative?
hopefully it takes you guys as long as it did UT to figure it out. I suggest hiring a guy good at raising money but who doesn't understand the "athletic" part of the gig. then follow it up with a NC winning past head coach with little to no experience to be the AD.Our AD can kick rocks.
I can’t remember the overall leadership at UF being this poor in my lifetime.
Kiffy will be losing a ton of talent this off-season. So it would be a good opportunity to jump ship. But at the same time, he sort of has it made at Ole Miss at the moment. He'll be gone at UF within 4 years if he isn't winning at least 8-9 games per year.Does UF make a run at Kiffy?
Kiffy will be losing a ton of talent this off-season. So it would be a good opportunity to jump ship. But at the same time, he sort of has it made at Ole Miss at the moment. He'll be gone at UF within 4 years if he isn't winning at least 8-9 games per year.
Ole Miss is a much better job now than it was when he took it over. Ole Miss actually has a good NIL and with the 12 team playoff, has a better than decent chance of making it in.
As a side note, with the new playoff format, I think teams will find it harder to pull good HCs from non traditional power house schools. Coaches like Lance Leipold will see that it is far easier to compete for a playoff spot at Kansas than at somewhere like UF. Obviously money talks, but UF can't use "competing for a Natty" as a good selling point anymore, because it's easier to compete for a Natty where they are,